Regular paper
In vivo photodynamic therapy with the new near-IR absorbing water soluble photosensitizer lutetium texaphyrin and a high intensity pulsed light delivery system

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(96)00005-XGet rights and content

Abstract

An in vivo fluorescence monitoring and photodynamic therapy (PDT) study was performed using the new photosensitizer lutetium texaphyrin (Lu-Tex). This photosensitizer is water soluble and has the additional advantage of strong absorption near 730 nm. C26 colon carcinoma was transplanted in the foot of BALB/c mice. In vivo fluorescence spectroscopy was applied to study Lu-Tex tissue distribution kinetics. For this purpose, fluorescence intensity both in the foot with the tumor and in the normal foot was measured in vivo by the laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) system. For PDT, both feet of the mice were irradiated simultaneously with the use of a new high intensity pulsed light delivery system, the Photodyne. The results of the LIF measurements showed that the maximal fluorescence intensity ratio between the normal and tumor bearing foot (FIR) was observed 24–48 h after the agent injection. Photoirradiation with doses from 90 to 240 J cm−2 (0.6 J cm−2 per 2 ms pulse, 1 Hz) 24 h after injection of Lu-Tex at a dose of 10 mg kg−1 caused significant tumor necrosis and delay in the tumor growth rate. The antitumor effect was enhanced with increasing light doses. Normal tissue response to PDT with Lu-Tex was determined as the damage index of the normal foot, which was irradiated simultaneously with the tumor bearing foot. The normal tissue response after PDT with Lu-Tex was compared with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) induced protoporphyrin IX (PP), chlorin e6 (Chl) and Photofrin (PII) at the same values of antitumor effect. The results showed that at 50, 80 and 100% inhibition of tumor growth the orders of the values of normal foot damage indexes were as follows: ALA > Lu-Tex ≥ PII > Chl, PII > ALA > Lu-Tex > Chl and PII > Lu-Tex > ALA > Chl respectively.

References (17)

  • R. Pottier

    In vitro and in vivo fluorescence monitoring of photosensitizers

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol.

    (1990)
  • G.M. Garbo

    Purpurins and benzochlorins as sensitizers for photodynamic therapy

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol.

    (1996)
  • C.J. Gomer

    Preclinical examination of first and second generation of photosensitizers used in photodynamic therapy Photochem

    Photobiol.

    (1991)
  • J.L. Sessler et al.

    Synthesis and structural characterization of lanthanide (III) texaphyrins

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1993)
  • A. Harriman et al.

    Methallotexaphyrins: a new family of photosensitizes for efficient generation of singlet oxygen

    J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.

    (1989)
  • J.L. Sessler et al.

    Tripyrroledimethine-derived (Texaphyrin type) macrocycles: potential photosensitizers which absorb in the far red spectral region

    SPIE 1426

    (1991)
  • B. Ehrenberg et al.

    The binding and photosensitization effects of tetrabenzoporphyrins and texaphyrin in bacterial cells

    Lasers Med. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.L. Sessler, A. Harriman. R.A. Miller, T.D. Mody, G.W. Hemmi, V. Kral, D. Magda, Radiation sensitization using...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Photodynamic therapy in colorectal cancer treatment-The state of the art in preclinical research

    2016, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    The antitumor effect was enhanced with increasing light fluences. The healthy tissue phototoxicity after treatment with Lu-Tex was significantly higher than that for chlorin e6 and significantly lower than for Photofrin® at 80–100% tumor growth inhibition [94]. Messmann et al. undertook experiments using ALA administered intravenously to establish the threshold doses required for inducing necrosis.

  • Advances in imaging probes and optical microendoscopic imaging techniques for early in vivo cancer assessment

    2014, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    There are several photosensitizing drugs that have been approved by worldwide food and drug administration agencies including porfimer sodium (Photofrin®; U.S., EU, UK, Canada, Japan, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, The Netherlands), 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA, Levulan®; U.S., EU), Methyl ester of ALA (Metvix®; U.S., Norway, EU), and meso-tetra-hydroxy-phenyl-chlorin (mTHPC, temoporfin, Foscan®; EU, Norway, Iceland) [40,46]. NIR activated photosensitizers in research are also prominent theranostic agents for in vivo PDD and PDT improvement [47–49]. However, photosensitizer usages are limited only for superficial tumor diagnosis and therapy due to the depth of illuminated light penetrability.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text