Clinical surgery—InternationalMapping surgical practice decision making: an interview study to evaluate decisions in surgical care
Section snippets
Aims
The first objective of this study was to map the process of care from the perspective of surgical decision making by identifying explicitly all the decisions in the care pathway of patients with symptomatic gallstone disease, which was used as a clinical exemplar. The second objective was to test whether the high-level, cognitive surgical skill of decision making can be deconstructed reliably into a conceptually accessible format for surgical trainees.
Design
We used interviews with a group of experienced surgeons to elicit the key decisions in the management of patients with symptomatic gallstones, our clinical exemplar. Qualitative research methods have provided a useful framework for addressing other behavioral research questions in surgery, such as communication in operating rooms.7 Interviews have also been used to elicit how expert clinicians' knowledge of particular clinical conditions is represented as sophisticated “illness scripts”.8
Participants
We
Results
In the first section of results, we present our findings regarding what decisions must be made by a surgeon treating a patient with symptomatic gallstone disease. In the second section, we discuss surgeons' decision strategies. We also discuss the only judgement of risk expressed quantitatively by surgeons, their estimation of the probability of conversion of a laparoscopic procedure to open.
Comments
The first aim of this study was to identify explicitly what decisions are made in the course of routine care of patients with symptomatic gallstone disease and to map the process of care from the perspective of surgical decision making. We think that the study accomplished this aim. Our analysis of interviews with 10 experienced surgeons identified 18 key decisions across the different phases of care (pre-, intra-, and post-operative) and across both elective treatment and emergency admission.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Royal College of Surgeons of England for supporting this study via a research fellowship kindly provided by the Grand Lodge 250th Anniversary Fund and the Rosetrees Foundation, and also the British Academy for additional support.
References (17)
- et al.
What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation?
Am J Surg
(2001) - et al.
Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory
Am J Surg
(2004) - et al.
The use of cognitive task analysis to improve the learning of percutaneous tracheostomy placement
Am J Surg
(2007) A History of Surgery
(2002)Preface
The New Intercollegiate Curriculum for Surgical Education
(2005)Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends
Med Educ
(2005)What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning
Med Educ
(2005)
Cited by (41)
How Do Pediatric Neurosurgeons Make Intraoperative Decisions?
2021, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :Despite the tremendous importance of good decision making judgment in the operating room (OR), almost nothing is known about how these decisions are made.2 A few studies of general surgeons found that they described making intraoperative decisions intuitively or analytically.2-4 For decisions that involved uncertainty, surgeons relied on clinical experience.2,3
Thinking like an expert: Surgical decision making as a cyclical process of being aware
2016, American Journal of SurgeryWhen surgeons face intraoperative challenges: A naturalistic model of surgical decision making
2013, American Journal of SurgeryFactors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: An interview study of the provider perspective
2013, International Journal of SurgeryCitation Excerpt :A qualitative, semi-structured interview-based approach was employed to investigate key issues surrounding MDT decision-making and decision implementation in urological and gastro-intestinal (GI) tumours. Qualitative techniques based on expert contributions are appropriate when complex clinical issues are to be investigated and experts' views are sought regarding care processes.26,27 The outputs of such studies are subsequently used as a basis for large scale surveys, expert consensus development, or the development of interventions.
Major incident preparation for acute hospitals: Current state-of-the-art, training needs analysis, and the role of novel virtual worlds simulation technologies
2012, Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Qualitative approaches are ideal when detailed exploration of complex issues is required, and expert opinion is sought (22). Such approaches have been used extensively within our research group (23,24). Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the North West London Research Ethics Committee (Reference 11/LO/0850).
Decision making in surgical oncology
2011, Surgical Oncology