Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 112, Issue 3, March 2005, Pages 366-375
Ophthalmology

Original article
Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.030Get rights and content

Objective

The European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) seeks to evaluate the efficacy of reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) by dorzolamide in preventing or delaying primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients affected by ocular hypertension (OHT).

Design

Randomized, double-masked, controlled clinical trial.

Participants

One thousand eighty-one patients (age, ≥30 years) were enrolled by 18 European centers. The patients fulfilled a series of inclusion criteria, including: IOP 22 to 29 mmHg; 2 normal and reliable visual fields (on the basis of mean deviation and corrected pattern standard deviation or corrected loss variance of standard 30/II Humphrey or Octopus perimetry); normal optic disc as determined by the Optic Disc Reading Center.

Intervention

Patients were randomized to treatment with dorzolamide or placebo (the vehicle of dorzolamide).

Main outcome measures

Efficacy end points were visual field, optic disc changes, or both. A visual field change during follow-up had to be confirmed by 2 further positive tests. Optic disc change was defined on the basis of the agreement of 2 of 3 independent observers evaluating optic disc stereo slides. The safety end point was an IOP of more than 35 mmHg on 2 consecutive examinations.

Results

During the course of the study, the mean percent reduction in IOP in the dorzolamide group was 15% after 6 months and 22% after 5 years. Mean IOP declined by 9% after 6 months and by 19% after 5 years in the placebo group. At 60 months, the cumulative probability of converting to an efficacy end point was 13.4% in the dorzolamide group and 14.1% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–1.26; P = 0.45). The cumulative probability of developing an efficacy or a safety end point was 13.7% in the dorzolamide group and 16.4% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51–1.06; P = 0.1).

Conclusions

Dorzolamide reduced IOP by 15% to 22% throughout the 5 years of the trial. However, the EGPS failed to detect a statistically significant difference between medical therapy and placebo in reducing the incidence of POAG among a large population of OHT patients at moderate risk for developing POAG, because placebo also significantly and consistently lowered IOP.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

The EGPS was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The design and methods of the EGPS were described previously20 and are summarized as follows.

Results

The enrollment of the patients lasted from January 1997 through May 1999. A total of 1081 patients were enrolled. However, because of the enrollment of 4 patients with glaucoma (i.e., major protocol violators), the overall number of the randomized patients included in the intention-to-treat analysis was reduced to 1077 (including 2 patients younger than 30 years).

The details concerning the baseline description of the participants were provided in the previously published article.20 In addition,

Discussion

At the time the EGPS was designed, there was no clear clinical evidence concerning the relationship between pressure reduction and conversion to POAG.27 Management of OHT patients mainly was based on clinical experience or the results of conflicting clinical studies. The recently published results of the OHTS have shown that it is possible to prevent or delay the development of POAG in OHT patients by achieving an 18% net IOP reduction from baseline maintained for at least 5 years.9

The EGPS

Acknowledgments

The EGPS Group acknowledges the members of the Writing Committee: Stefano Miglior, Thierry Zeyen, Norbert Pfeiffer, Jose Cunha-Vaz, Valter Torri, and Ingrid Adamsons.

References (41)

  • E. Strahlman et al.

    A six-week dose-response study of the ocular hypotensive effect of dorzolamide with a one-year extension

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • M.C. Leske et al.

    Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data

    Ophthalmology

    (1999)
  • D.C. Musch et al.

    The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients

    Ophthalmology

    (1999)
  • Preferred Practice Pattern. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

    (1992)
  • A. Sommer et al.

    Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black AmericansThe Baltimore Eye Survey

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1991)
  • J.M. Tielsch et al.

    Hypertension, perfusion pressure, and primary open angle glaucomaA population-based assessment

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1995)
  • C. Leske et al.

    Risk factors for open-angle glaucomaThe Barbados Eye Study

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1995)
  • J.M. Tielsch et al.

    Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucomaThe Baltimore Eye Survey

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1994)
  • C. Ekstrom

    Elevated intraocular pressure and pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule as risk factors for chronic open-angle glaucomaA population-based five-year follow-up study

    Acta Ophthalmol

    (1993)
  • Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment...
  • Cited by (302)

    • Five-Year Visual Field Outcomes of the HORIZON Trial

      2023, American Journal of Ophthalmology
    • The natural history of untreated ocular hypertension and glaucoma

      2023, Survey of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because of the use of photogrammetric measurements, there was less potential for high variability in assessment.[57] Neuroretinal rim was investigated in most of the reviewed studies.[16], [30], [33], [34], [47], [48], [56] Progression was usually defined as diffuse or localised thinning.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 240378.

    Supported by The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium (BIOMED II program, contract no.: BMH4-CT-96-1598), and Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey.

    [email protected]

    1

    See “Appendix” for a list of the group's members, and “Acknowledgments” for writing committee identification.

    View full text