Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 117, Issue 3, March 2010, Pages 453-461
Ophthalmology

Original article
Screening for Glaucoma in High-Risk Populations Using Optical Coherence Tomography

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.033Get rights and content

Objective

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) for glaucoma screening in high-risk populations.

Design

Cross-sectional evaluation of a diagnostic test for screening.

Participants

Three hundred thirty-three community-based volunteer participants with risk factors for glaucoma.

Methods

The optic nerve and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) of participants' eyes were scanned using the Stratus OCT. Based on an ophthalmologic examination and frequency doubling perimetry, eyes were classified into 4 categories: normal, possible glaucoma, probable glaucoma, and definitive glaucoma.

Main Outcome Measures

The sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative likelihood ratios of the RNFL, optic disc parameters, and their combinations were calculated.

Results

The right eyes were retained for analyses. After excluding eyes with missing data or with poor quality scans, the data of 210 right eyes were analyzed. Six eyes had definitive glaucoma. Combining the best performing optic nerve head parameters (cup diameter or cup/disc vertical ratio or cup/disc area ratio) and RNFL parameters (superior average or inferior average or overall average) using AND-logic resulted in a sensitivity of 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%–94%), specificity of 96% (95% CI, 92%–98%), a positive likelihood ratio of 17.08 (95% CI, 7.06–41.4), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.11–1.08).

Conclusions

When adequate quality scans may be obtained, the Stratus has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for definitive glaucoma. Specificity is increased when parameters from both the optic nerve head and RNFL scans are combined.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Section snippets

Methods

The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy were reviewed and followed.25

Results

All subjects met ≥1 high-risk inclusion criterion. Of 333 participants who were examined, 30 were excluded owing to missing data: 7 subjects had a missing FDT VF and 23 had missing Stratus scans. Of the remaining 303 patients, 51 were examined and tested at the hospital (Rosemont pavilion where the eye clinic was located until 2005), 77 were examined and tested at the new ambulatory eye clinic of the hospital (Centre de santé ambulatoire, which opened in 2005), 127 at the Glaucoma Institute of

Discussion

Glaucoma imaging is currently used as an adjunct to other clinical parameters important in glaucoma diagnosis and progression.33 The performance of the Stratus for glaucoma detection has been evaluated in patients followed in eye clinics. Within this population, the sensitivity of the best performing RNFL parameters ranges between 75% and 85% for specificities >88%.17, 22, 34, 35, 36, 37 However, patients followed in eye clinics by glaucoma specialists have more advanced disease than in a

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Miguel Chagnon, PhD, for his statistical help.

References (50)

  • G. Wollstein et al.

    Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2005)
  • A.U. Bayer et al.

    Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects

    Ophthalmology

    (2002)
  • F.A. Medeiros et al.

    Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2004)
  • Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2004)
  • The screening of primary open-angle glaucoma

  • Screening for glaucoma: recommendation statement

    Ann Fam Med

    (2005)
  • C. Fleming et al.

    Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma in the primary care setting: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force

    Ann Fam Med

    (2005)
  • A. Sommer et al.

    Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans: the Baltimore Eye Survey

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1991)
  • J.M. Tielsch et al.

    Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1994)
  • B. Nemesure et al.

    Analyses of reported family history of glaucoma: a preliminary investigation

    Ophthalmic Epidemiol

    (1996)
  • R.C. Wolfs et al.

    Genetic risk of primary open-angle glaucoma: population-based familial aggregation study

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1998)
  • R. Hernandez et al.

    Screening for open angle glaucoma: systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies

    J Glaucoma

    (2008)
  • A. Sommer et al.

    Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss: IMethods and progressive changes in disc morphology

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1979)
  • J. Funk

    Early detection of glaucoma by longitudinal monitoring of the optic disc structure

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

    (1991)
  • M. Motolko et al.

    Features of the optic disc in preglaucomatous eyes

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1981)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Posterior pole asymmetry analysis and retinal thickness measurements in young relatives of glaucoma patients

      2015, Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of our starting points was that it is possible that relatives of glaucoma patients have fewer retinal ganglion cells at the start of their lives and are therefore more likely to display thinner retinal layers. In contrast to previous reports, we included only young adults in order to eliminate age-related glaucoma risk [5,6]. We hypothesized that new early diagnostic techniques may show some defects in the posterior pole retina of young relatives of POAG patients.

    • Screening for Glaucoma

      2015, Glaucoma: Second Edition
    • The value of tests in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma

      2011, American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, appropriate clinical acumen in the application of testing will naturally increase test usefulness. Sophisticated arguments have been made that combinations of tests may improve the performance of any single test in isolation, with the identification of clinically relevant changes after integrating diverse measures (such as computerized perimetry data with HRT or OCT imaging)—but often these efforts show only equivocal sensitivities and specificities.62–71 The few population-based attempts to improve on the detection of glaucoma using this integrative strategy have not been very successful.9

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 2009-300.

    Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have made the following disclosures:

    Gisèle Li - research funding, consultant/advisor and lecture – Allergan; consultant/advisor and lecture fees – Pfizer; consultant/advisor fees – Alcon; lecture fees - Merck & Co.

    Paul Harasymowycz - consultant/advisor and lecture fees - Allergan, Alcon, Pfizer, and Merck & Co; consultant fees - SOLX.

    The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

    Supported by Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec and Allergan, Irvine, CA. The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

    View full text