Original articleSubclinical Macular Findings in Infants Screened for Retinopathy of Prematurity with Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the institutional review boards at the Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, conformed to the requirements of the US Health Insurance Portability and Privacy Act, and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the parent or legal guardian of all patients. Forty-nine patients in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin were enrolled. Children's Hospital of
Results
There were 241 (80%) usable scans obtained from 46 of the 49 patients. Images were evaluated for the presence of inner retinal layers at the foveal center. Subject-specific data for residual inner retinal layers are shown in Table 1 (available at http://aaojournal.org). Only 3 patients showed complete foveal excavation with no residual inner retinal layers present. Persistence of 1 or more retinal layers was present in 43 patients (93%), examples of this are shown in Figure 2. In 3 patients the
Discussion
Foveal development involves the centrifugal displacement of inner retinal cells and centripetal displacement of photoreceptors.17 Previous studies have shown that there is persistence of inner retinal layers in children and adults with a history of ROP.5, 6 In these patients, the presence of inner retinal layers does not appear to affect visual acuity.5 Studies, including ours, have also shown a persistence of inner retinal layers in infants undergoing screening for acute ROP.10 Our data add
References (24)
- et al.
Optical coherence tomography findings in stage 4A retinopathy of prematurity: a theory for visual variability
Ophthalmology
(2006) - et al.
Dynamics of human foveal development after premature birth
Ophthalmology
(2011) - et al.
Insights into advanced retinopathy of prematurity using handheld spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging
Ophthalmology
(2009) - et al.
Reversible retinal edema in an infant with neonatal hemochromatosis and liver failure
J AAPOS
(2011) - et al.
Ontogeny of the primate fovea: a central issue in retinal development
Prog Neurobiol
(1998) - et al.
Bevacizumab for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: a prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical study
Ophthalmology
(2012) Visual acuity at 10 years in Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity (CRYO-ROP) study eyes: effect of retinal residua of retinopathy of prematurity
Arch Ophthalmol
(2006)- et al.
Central macular thickness is correlated with gestational age at birth in prematurely born children
Br J Ophthalmol
(2011) - et al.
A comparison of macular structure imaged by optical coherence tomography in preterm and full-term children
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
(2007) - et al.
Foveal dysplasia evident by optical coherence tomography in patients with a history of retinopathy of prematurity
Retina
(2007)
Foveal fine structure in retinopathy of prematurity: an adaptive optics Fourier domain optical coherence tomography study
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic assessment of severity of cystoid macular edema in retinopathy of prematurity
Arch Ophthalmol
Cited by (76)
Longitudinal Choroidal Development in Preterm Infants
2024, Ophthalmology ScienceIdentification of novel biomarkers for retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants by use of innovative technologies and artificial intelligence
2023, Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchInsights into the developing fovea revealed by imaging
2022, Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchCitation Excerpt :As most studies perform OCT imaging at the time of ROP screening, and ROP screening frequency is determined by the ROP severity, there is thus far no study with consistent and frequent OCT scans captured every 1–2 weeks to determine the exact onset and duration of macular edema. Based on the best available information, macular edema occurs as early as 31 weeks PMA (Dubis et al., 2013; Gursoy et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2011; Maldonado et al., 2011b, 2012; Vinekar et al., 2011; Vogel et al., 2018) and is transient and self-resolving with a resolution between 40 and 65 weeks PMA in preterm infants (Maldonado et al., 2011b). Early-onset edema (occurring at or before 33 weeks PMA) had a more severe morphology, with foveal bulging and elongated cystoid spaces compared to late-onset edema (occurring at or after 36 weeks PMA), which presented with small cystoid spaces in the parafovea (Mangalesh et al., 2020).
Analysis of optical coherence tomography angiographic findings of prematurely born children and its relationship with macular edema of prematurity
2022, Journal of AAPOSCitation Excerpt :To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the FAZ area and foveal VD in preterm children with and without a history of CME. Macular edema in premature infants has been reported in various ethnic groups and has been shown to resolve spontaneously.2-5 Vinekar and colleagues3 showed that visual acuity is worse in eyes with macular edema compared to controls through the first year of life and that these eyes had higher hyperopic refraction.
Macular OCT Characteristics at 36 Weeks’ Postmenstrual Age in Infants Examined for Retinopathy of Prematurity
2021, Ophthalmology RetinaCitation Excerpt :Also in this cohort, our data indicated that macular edema was present and mostly bilateral in at least 60% of infants. The prevalence of macular edema in our current study was similar to that of previous reports from the United States8,12 but was higher than those reported in India10 and Turkey11 (Table 6). We found lower rates of bilateral edema,8,10,11 but all eyes with unilateral edema showed mild severity; the asymmetry of edema in these few cases may be the result of the presence of microcysts in the other eye that may not have reached the level for a grade of mild edema.
Manuscript no. 2012-1543.
Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P30EY001931, T32EY014537, and R01EY017607; The E. Matilda Ziegler Foundation for the Blind; RD and Linda Peters Foundation; and an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness. Part of this investigation was conducted in a facility constructed with support from Research Facilities Improvement Program Grant C06 RR016511 from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. PG is supported by a research award from the VitreoRetinal Surgery Foundation.
Both Adam M. Dubis, PhD and C. Devika Subramaniam, MD contributed equally to the work presented and should be regarded as equivalent authors.