Abstract
The second-generation macrolide azithromycin is available as a 1.5% ophthalmic solution for use in the treatment of bacterial or trachomatous conjunctivitis. This article reviews the pharmacological properties of azithromycin 1.5% ophthalmic solution and its clinical efficacy and tolerability in patients with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis or trachomatous conjunctivitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
Azithromycin 1.5% ophthalmic solution had good in vitro activity against Haemophilus influenzae and C. trachomatis, and achieved good concentrations in tear samples from healthy volunteers.
Azithromycin 1.5% ophthalmic solution for 3 days (1 drop twice daily) was noninferior to tobramycin 0.3% ophthalmic solution for 7 days (1 drop every 2 hours) in paediatric and adult patients with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis, with regard to clinical cure and bacteriological resolution on day 9, in a randomized, investigator-masked, multicentre study.
In children with trachomatous inflammation, 3-day treatment with azithromycin 1.5% ophthalmic solution was noninferior to a single dose of azithromycin oral suspension, with regard to clinical cure rate in the worst eye at 60 days, in a randomized, double-masked, multicentre study.
Azithromycin 1.5% ophthalmic solution was well tolerated in patients with bacterial or trachomatous conjunctivitis. Most events were of mild to moderate severity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Høvding G. Acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmol 2008 Feb; 86(1): 5–17
Tarabishy AB, Jeng BH. Bacterial conjunctivitis: a review0 for internists. Cleve Clin J Med 2008 Jul; 75(7): 507–12
Mathew AA, Turner A, Taylor HR. Strategies to control trachoma. Drugs 2009 May 29; 69(8): 953–70
Brémond-Gignac D, Chiambaretta F, Milazzo S. A European perspective on topical ophthalmic antibiotics: current and evolving options. Ophthalmol Eye Dis 2011; 3: 29–43
Brémond-Gignac D, Mariani-Kurkdjian P, Beresniak A, et al. Efficacy and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010 Mar; 29(3): 222–6
Denis F, Chaumeil C, Goldschmidt P, et al. Microbiological efficacy of 3-day treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eyedrops for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2008 Nov 31; 18(6): 858–68
Spectrum Thea Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Azyter® (azithromycin dihydrate 1.5% ophthalmic solution): summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/medicine/24743/SPC/Azyter/ [Accessed 2012 Jan 9]
Asbell PA, Colby KA, Deng S, et al. Ocular TRUST: nationwide antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in ocular isolates. Am J Ophthalmol 2008 Jun; 145(6): 951–8
Ohnsman C, Ritterband D, O’Brien T, et al. Comparison of azithromycin and moxifloxacin against bacterial isolates causing conjunctivitis. Curr Med Res Opin 2007 Sep; 23(9): 2241–9
Haas W, Pillar CM, Torres M, et al. Monitoring antibiotic resistance in ocular microorganisms: results from the Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular micRorganisms (ARMOR) 2009 surveillance study. Am J Ophthalmol 2011 Oct; 152(4): 567–74.e3
Hong KC, Schachter J, Moncada J, et al. Lack of macrolide resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis after mass azithromycin distributions for trachoma. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15(7): 1088–90
Swainston Harrison T, Keam SJ. Azithromycin extended release: a review of its use in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis and community-acquired pneumonia in the US. Drugs 2007; 67(5): 773–92
Garcia-Layana A. Anti-inflammatory effects of the azithromycin 1.5% eye drops (Azyter®) (animal model) [abstract no. 185 plus oral presentation]. 11th International Ocular Inflammation Society Congress and International Assembly of Ocular Inflammation Societies; 2011 Nov 13–16; Benaulim
Mencucci R, Paladini I, Favuzza E, et al. Azithromycin: intrinsic cytotoxic effects on corneal epithelial cell cultures [abstract no. 1499/D897]. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology; 2011 May 1–5; Fort Lauderdale (FL)
Chiambaretta F, Garraffo R, Elena PP, et al. Tear concentrations of azithromycin following topical administration of a single dose of azithromycin 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% eyedrops (T1225) in healthy volunteers. Eur J Ophthalmol 2008 Jan 28; 18(1): 13–20
Goldschmidt PL, Chiambaretta F, Garraffo R, et al. Tear concentrations of azithromycin (AZM) following a single instillation and a bid dosing regimen for 3 days of T1225 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% eye-drops [abstract no. 773/B548]. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology; 2007 May 6–10; Fort Lauderdale (FL)
Amar T, Caillaud T, Elena P-P. Ocular pharmacokinetic study following single and multiple azithromycin administrations in pigmented rabbits. Curr Eye Res 2008; 33(2): 149–58
Tabbara KF, Kotb AA, Hammouda EF, et al. Effects of dehydration on corneal tissue absorption of topical azithromycin in rabbits. Curr Eye Res 2005 Oct; 30(10): 915–8
Cochereau I, Meddeb-Ouertani A, Khairallah M, et al. 3-day treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus 7-day treatment with tobramycin 0.3% for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis: multicentre, randomised and controlled trial in adults and children. Br J Ophthalmol 2007 Apr; 91(4): 465–9
Cochereau I, Goldschmidt P, Goepogui A, et al. Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2007 May; 91(5): 667–72
Ambroziak AM, Szaflik JP, Hapunik A. Evaluation of effectiveness and tolerance of treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops in bacterial conjunctivitis [in Polish]. Klin Oczna 2009; 111(1–3): 46–9
Amza A, Goldschmidt P, Einterz E, et al. Elimination of active trachoma after two topical mass treatments with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010; 4(11): e895
Robert PY, Bourcier T, Meddeb-Ouertani A, et al. Efficacy assessment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus tobramycin 0.3% on clinical signs of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis [in French]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2010 Apr; 33(4): 241–8
Laboratoires Thea. Clinical efficacy and safety of T1225 versus tobramycin 0.3% eye drops in the treatment of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis of children [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01155999]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov [Accessed 2012 Jan 23]
Laboratoires Thea. Efficacy and safety assessment of Azyter® eye drops (T1225) in patients with blepharitis [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01089608]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov [Accessed 2011 Dec 14]
Acknowledgements and Disclosures
The manuscript was reviewed by: F. Allerberger, Division of Public Health, Österreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit (AGES), Vienna, Austria; D. Brémond-Gignac, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Amiens, Picardie Jules Verne University, Amiens, France.
The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding. During the peer review process, the manufacturer of the agent under review was offered an opportunity to comment on this article. Changes resulting from comments received were made by the author on the basis of scientific and editorial merit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garnock-Jones, K.P. Azithromycin 1.5% Ophthalmic Solution. Drugs 72, 361–373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11208580-000000000-00000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11208580-000000000-00000