Purpose: To report the probable association of motility coupling post placement and late porous polyethylene implant exposure.
Design: Retrospective, observational case series.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 27 patients who had primary porous polyethylene orbital implantation from February 1999 to November 2000. Data on demographics, previous surgery, ocular diagnosis, type of surgery, size of the implant, and motility coupling post placement were collected. Complications of porous polyethylene implants and implant exposure were documented.
Results: Among the 27 patients, 18 eyes (66.7%) received motility coupling post insertion after primary porous polyethylene implantation. Implant exposure occurred in six (33.3%) of the 18 eyes with motility coupling post insertion. None of the eyes without insertion had implant exposure. The mean interval between porous polyethylene implantation and motility coupling post placement for the implant exposure group (6 of 18) was 6.5 +/- 0.4 months, which was not statistically significant compared with 7.2 +/- 0.6 months in the nonexposure group (12 of 18). For these 6 cases of implant exposure, the mean interval between implantation and implant exposure was 24.2 +/- 11.8 months, and the mean interval between pegging and exposure was 17.6 +/- 11.7 months. Among these 6 patients, 4 underwent removal of exposed porous polyethylene implants and reimplantation of hydroxyapatite implant or dermis fat reconstruction.
Conclusions: We found a trend (P =.07) of increasing risk of porous polyethylene implant exposure with motility coupling post placement. Although the pegging group did not show a statistically significant higher rate of exposure compared with the nonpegging group, we believe that more care was needed when performing motility coupling post placement. In addition, longer postoperative follow-up is needed after insertion of a motility coupling post.