Background/aims Numerous processes have been implicated as causes of punctal stenosis. Recent studies have highlighted inflammation in punctoplasty specimens in patients with punctal stenosis. Conjunctival biopsy has been suggested as a means to determine underlying aetiologies, although little is known regarding what conjunctival pathologies are associated with punctal stenosis. Our objective is to examine the pathological and immunological findings in conjunctival biopsy specimens in patients with presumed idiopathic punctal stenosis.
Methods A retrospective chart review was performed at a single institution over a 5 year period of patients with presumed idiopathic punctal stenosis who underwent conjunctival biopsy for histopathological and/or direct immunofluorescence (DIF) examination. Patients with known aetiologies of punctal stenosis were excluded.
Results 23 patients met inclusion criteria. Conjunctival biopsies (n=36) from all 23 patients underwent histological examination. 35 specimens (97.2%) showed lymphocytic infiltrates. Two patients (8.7%) had findings suggestive of sarcoidosis. Conjunctival biopsies from 18 of the 23 patients were also evaluated by DIF. Nine patients (50.0%) had fibrinogen characteristics suggestive of lichen planus. There were no complications related to the conjunctival biopsy procedures.
Conclusions Conjunctiva appears to be an excellent proxy in evaluating patients with presumed idiopathic punctal stenosis. The biopsy is safe and provides ample tissue. Clinically, abnormal tissue should be targeted, if available. 11 of the 23 patients in this study demonstrated findings consistent with underlying immunological disorders, suggesting that conjunctival biopsy may play a role in identifying underlying aetiologies of punctal stenosis. Knowledge of these underlying conditions impacted treatments for several patients.
- Lacrimal drainage
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors RCA designed the study, analysed data, and drafted and revised the paper. He is guarantor. AKR designed the study, analysed data, and drafted and revised the paper. MSB designed the study, analysed data, and drafted and revised the paper. ACM analysed data and revised the paper. NAS designed the study, analysed data and revised the paper.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval University of Iowa Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.