Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The role of day one postoperative review of intraocular pressure in modern vitrectomy surgery
  1. Nicholas Brennan1,
  2. Ian Reekie2,
  3. Eric Ezra1,
  4. Keith Barton1,
  5. Ananth Viswanathan1,
  6. Mahiul MK Muqit1
  1. 1 Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mahiul MK Muqit, Vitreoretinal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Rd, London EC1V 2PD, UK; mahi.muqit{at}moorfields.nhs.uk

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors meet the criteria for authorship laid down by the ICMJE. NB made contributions to the conception and design of the work, the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data and has contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. IR made contributions to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data and has contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. EE, KB and AV made contributions to the conception and design of the work, and have contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. MMKM made contributions to the conception and design of the work, the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data and has contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Moorfields Eye Hospital Institutional Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors meet the criteria for authorship laid down by the ICMJE. NB made contributions to the conception and design of the work, the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data and has contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. IR made contributions to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data and has contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. EE, KB and AV made contributions to the conception and design of the work, and have contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. MMKM made contributions to the conception and design of the work, the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data and has contributed to the drafting of the work and revising it for intellectual content and had approved the final version for publication. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Moorfields Eye Hospital Institutional Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • At a glance
    Keith Barton James Chodosh Jost B Jonas