Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Visual and ocular motor function in the atypical form of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation type I
  1. Joana Jesus-Ribeiro1,
  2. Cláudia Farinha2,3,
  3. Margarida Amorim4,
  4. Anabela Matos1,5,
  5. Aldina Reis6,
  6. João Lemos1,
  7. Miguel Castelo-Branco6,
  8. Cristina Januário1,7
  1. 1 Department of Neurology, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
  2. 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
  3. 3 Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, Coimbra, Portugal
  4. 4 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
  5. 5 Department of Neurophysiology, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
  6. 6 Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  7. 7 Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joana Jesus-Ribeiro, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Praceta Mota Pinto, Coimbra 3000-075, Portugal; joanajribeiro{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background/aims Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA) type I is a rare disease that can be divided into a classical or atypical variant, according to age of onset and clinical pattern. Neuro-ophthalmological involvement has been documented in the classical variant but only anecdotically in the atypical variant. We sought to describe the visual and ocular motor function in patients with atypical form of NBIA type I.

Methods Cross-sectional study, including patients with genetically confirmed NBIA type I and classified as atypical variant, who underwent ophthalmological examination with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), electroretinography (ERG), visual evoked potentials (VEP) and video-oculography.

Results Seven patients with a mean BCVA of 0.12±0.14 logMAR were included. Only two patients showed structural evidence of advanced retinopathy in OCT and FAF, and there were no cases of optic atrophy. ERG data, however, showed abnormal scotopic and/or photopic responses in all patients. VEP were normal in all three patients. Ocular fixation was markedly unstable (eg, increased rate of saccadic pulses) in the majority of patients (5). Additional mild ocular motor disturbances included low gain pursuit (2), hypermetric saccades (1), low gain optokinetic (2) and caloric and rotatory responses (3).

Conclusion Functional retinal changes associated with marked instability of ocular fixation should be included in the clinical spectrum of NBIA, particularly in the atypical form.

  • Retina
  • Optic Nerve
  • Genetics
  • Electrophysiology
  • Diagnostic tests/Investigation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors J

    J-R: design of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the data and writing the manuscript.

    CF: performance of ophthalmological examination, CFP, FAF and OCT, analysis and interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript. M

    A: performance of otorhinolaryngological examination, rotatory chair tests and caloric tests, interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript.

    AM: performance of VEP, analysis and interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript.

    AR: performance of ERG, analysis and interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript.

    JL: design of the study, performance of VOG and VHIT, analysis and interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript.

    MC-B: design of the study, performance of ERG, analysis and interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript.

    CJ: design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.