Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Preservatives in glaucoma medication
  1. David W Steven1,
  2. Pouya Alaghband2,
  3. Kin Sheng Lim3
  1. 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Eerste River and Groote Schuur Hospitals, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  2. 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
  3. 3 Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Kin Sheng Lim, Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK; shenglim{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Preservatives continue to be in widespread use in ophthalmic medications due to the convenience they provide, regulatory requirements and the higher cost of alternatives. Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) remains the most commonly used preservative but there is a trend towards the use of preservative-free (PF) drops for glaucoma, although at a higher price. An extensive body of literature explores BAK toxicity on ocular structures in animal and laboratory studies (in vitro and in vivo). Non-randomised controlled studies have provided some supporting evidence of its toxicity in patients, especially in those with pre-existing ocular surface disease (OSD) or on multiple medications. However, there have been very few randomised controlled trials that compare the same medication with and without BAK preservative. Several of these trials have never been published in any peer reviewed journals. Notwithstanding, those that have been published, have not demonstrated any clear benefits of the BAK-free formulations. Short duration and exclusion of those with OSD are limitations of these studies. There is a lack of evidence of clinically significant harm from a small number of BAK preserved drops in patients without OSD. This means that generally more expensive PF glaucoma medications should only be recommended for those on poly pharmacy or those with OSD but are not necessarily required for all patients.

  • benzalkonium chloride
  • BAK
  • preservatives
  • glaucoma
  • ocular surface disease (OSD).

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors KSL had the original idea for the article and is the guarantor. All other authors were involved in literature search, drafting, revising and final approval of the document.

  • Funding KSL is funded by the Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s & ST Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust.

  • Competing interests KSL has received grant from the Thea pharmaceuticals and travel support and lecture/consultancy fees from Allergan, Alcon, MSD and Thea. He is also an investigator in prospective randomised controlled trials using preservative-free glaucoma medications funded by the Allergan, Thea and Santen. DWS does not have any competing interest. PA has received educational grants and lecture fees from Thea pharmaceutical.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement There are no additional unpublished data from this study.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.