Article Text

PDF
Time trends, disease patterns and gender imbalance in the top 100 most cited articles in ophthalmology
  1. Matthew Yu Heng Wong1,2,
  2. Nicholas Y Q Tan1,
  3. Charumathi Sabanayagam1,3
  1. 1 Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
  2. 2 Anglo-Chinese School (Independent), Singapore
  3. 3 Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  1. Correspondence to Dr Charumathi Sabanayagam, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 169856, Singapore; charumathi.sabanayagam{at}seri.com.sg

Abstract

We analysed the 100 top cited articles in ophthalmology to identify and characterise the most influential articles of the past four decades. Two independent investigators searched the Scopus database to determine the 100 most frequently cited articles in ophthalmology (T100-Eye) and general non-ophthalmology journals (T100-Gen) published from 1975 to December 2017. The T100-Eye list consisted of 83 original articles and 17 reviews, and the number of citations ranged from 582 to 2833. Seventy-eight of these articles were published in three journals alone (impact factor (IF): 5.05–8.2), led by the Archives of Ophthalmology. The T100-Gen list consisted of 84 original articles and 16 reviews and the number of citations ranged from 358 to 3272. Forty-five of these articles were published in four journals alone (IF: 9.66–72.41). In both lists, majority of the first authors were from the USA (T100-Eye, n=80; T100-Gen, n=66), and were men (n=76 in T100-Eye; n=72 in T100-Gen). With regard to the article type, in the T100-Eye, among the 83 original research articles, most were randomised controlled trials (n=26) or clinical observational studies related to description of a new condition or new management (n=26). In the T100-Gen, of the 84 original research articles, many were clinical observational studies (n=27) or basic science research (n=26). In both lists, the most frequently examined diseases were age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. Our analysis reveals landmark articles, trends and medical advancements in ophthalmology over the past four decades. It also highlights gender disparity and influence of the USA in seminal ophthalmic research.

  • clinical trial
  • epidemiology
  • retina
  • glaucoma
  • vision

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors CS designed the study. MYHW and NYQT performed the literature review and the citation analysis. MYHW wrote the initial draft. NYQT and CS provided critical corrections to the manuscript. The final version of the paper has been seen and approved by all the authors.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.