Download PDFPDF
Repeatability of automated leakage quantification and microaneurysm identification utilising an analysis platform for ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Repeatability of automated leakage quantification and microaneurysm identification ‎utilising an analysis platform for ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. Avoid ‎misinterpretation
    • Siamak Sabour, Clinical Epidemiologist Department of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical ‎Sciences, Tehran, I.R.
    • Other Contributors:
      • Fariba Ghassemi, Retina and Vitreous Surgeon - Ocular Oncologist

    Applying Pearson r to assesses the repeatability of a test is a methodologic mistake which leads to ‎misinterpretation.‎

    Repeatability of automated leakage quantification and microaneurysm identification ‎utilising an analysis platform for ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. Avoid ‎misinterpretation
    Dear editor, We were interested to read the paper by Jiang A et al. published in Apr 2020 edition of the ‎Br J Ophthalmol.1 Ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography (UWFA) provides unique opportunities for ‎panretinal assessment of retinal diseases. The objective quantification of UWFA features is a labour-intensive ‎manual process, limiting its utility. The authors aimed to assesses the consistency/repeatability of an automated ‎assessment platform for the characterization of retinal vascular features, quantification of microaneurysms (MA) ‎and leakage foci in UWFA images. For each eye, two arteriovenous-phase images and two late-phase images ‎were selected. Automated assessment was performed for retinal vascular features, MA identification and ‎leakage segmentation. Panretinal and zonal assessment of metrics was performed. The authors mentioned a ‎significant correlation between paired time points for retinal vessel area and vessel length on early images ‎‎(Pearson r=0.92, p<0.0001; Pearson r=0.94, p<0.0001) and late images (Pearson r=0.92, p<0.0001; Pearson ‎r=0.92, p<0.0001, respectively). Panretinal and zonal MA counts demonst...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.