Dry eye disease (DED) is a growing public health concern affecting quality of life and visual function, with a significant socio-economic impact. It is characterised by the loss of homoeostasis, resulting in tear film instability, hyperosmolarity and inflammation of the ocular surface. If the innate immune response is unable to cope with internal bodily or environmental adverse conditions, the persistent, self-maintaining vicious circle of inflammation leads to the chronic form of the disease. Treatment of DED should be aimed at the restoration of the homoeostasis of the ocular surface system. A proper diagnostic approach is fundamental to define the relevance and importance of each of the DED main pathogenic factors, namely tear film instability, epithelial damage and inflammation. Consideration also needs to be given concerning two other pathogenic elements: lid margin changes and nerve damage. All the factors that maintain the vicious circle of DED in the patient’s clinical presentation have to be considered and possibly treated simultaneously. The treatment should be long-lasting and personalised since it has to be adapted to the different clinical conditions observed along the course of the disease. Since DED treatment is frequently unable to provide fast and complete relief from symptoms, empathy with patients and willingness to explain to them the natural history of the disease are mandatory to improve patients’ compliance. Furthermore, patients should be instructed about the possible need to increase the frequency and/or change the type of treatment according to the fluctuation of symptoms, following a preplanned rescue regimen.
- Eye Lids
- Ocular surface
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition with a prevalence ranging between 5% and 50% in the adult population.1 It is a disabling disorder affecting both visual function and quality of life, and has a significant socioeconomic impact. The disease is characterised by the loss of homoeostasis of the ocular surface, which results in tear film instability, hyperosmolarity and inflammation of the ocular surface.2– 5 A report by van Setten et al has suggested a link between seasonal environmental conditions and DED. In that study, almost half of responders stated that seasonal weather conditions had a significant impact on their symptoms, most notably wind and sunshine, whereas the summer and the winter were most commonly associated with dry eye complaints.6 Other factors that may contribute to the development or worsening of DED include contact lens wear.7 8
In a recent publication, a dry eye Experts Board presented a simple, time-saving flow chart, including a point-by-point explanatory guide, to better define the diagnosis of DED, in what was defined as a three-step method. To summarise, the three-step method was described as follows: the first step consisted in asking about symptoms with a questionnaire; the second step in observing the ocular surface at the slit lamp in order to study the tear film, the staining of the ocular surface for epithelial damage and lid conditions; the third step in addressing tear clearance and corneal sensitivity.9 In this article, we address the management of the patients once the dry eye diagnosis has been made. Based on the existing literature and on a consensus among the members of our study group, the opportunity of a dynamic therapeutic strategy according to the clinical results obtained during the course of the disease, is suggested. In this article, we wish to focus on the treatment necessary to obtain an improvement of the ocular surface conditions and a long-term control of the disease.
Taking into account the medical history and presence of possible risk factors, the authors proposed a more personalised, clinical assessment that could be achieved by considering the three pathogenic factors, which are always present at different levels of expression. These pathogenic factors are (1) tear film instability, (2) epithelial malfunction and damage and (3) more or less clinically evident inflammation. These factors can be exacerbated by other two pathogenic findings: lid margin changes and nerve damage (figure 1).26
In general, the treatment of DED should be aimed at re-establishing and maintaining the ocular surface system homoeostasis that was disrupted as a consequence of the vicious circle of the disease.10
PATHOGENIC FACTORS OF DED
Tear film instability is a hallmark of DED and is caused by changes in lipid layer function and in quantity, quality, and availability of tear fluid. It is an important source of symptoms and, possibly, one of the main sources of anatomical and functional changes of epithelia and, hence, a starting point for inflammation.11 Another important factor is the function of transmembrane and secretory mucins, which facilitate the contact between tear fluid and epithelial cells, adversely affected by tear film instability.12– 14
Epithelial malfunction caused by friction, adverse environmental factors, ocular surface irritation and/or nerve impairment can lead to a further injury. This plays a key role in the continued tear film instability, the increasing inflammatory reaction and the reduced protection of nerve endings.15 The initial inflammatory reaction on the ocular surface results from innate immunological processes, involving the epithelial response to external stimuli, mediated by the activation of toll-like receptors and the related cascade of events.16– 25 A strong and/or prolonged exposure to an inflammation-provoking stimulus may lead to an immunologic adaptive reaction, responsible for the chronic form of the disease.
The thickening and rounding of the lid margins, causing a reduced congruity with the eye bulb as well as the presence of eyelid notches, can affect the shape and function of the menisci. So the tear film distribution and the lipid layers spreading will be adversely affected. Impairment or malfunction of the lid-associated glands greatly influence the qualitative and/or quantitative composition of tear lipids, and are a possible source of inflammation and infection. Nerve function impairment and anatomical changes will affect both epithelial viability and turnover, in addition to tear film production. However, the role of nerve function in maintaining ocular surface homoeostasis and inducing the inflammatory response has yet to be elucidated.
DIAGNOSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF DED
At present, the cause of dysfunction can be difficult to be determined due to the number of potential factors already discussed, which makes an aetiological approach to treatment difficult to pursue. It is therefore of critical importance that a proper diagnostic approach determines the relevance of each of these factors in the patient’s clinical presentation, so that an effective, long-lasting and personalised treatment can be administered and modified if necessary.26 All the factors, which contribute to and maintain the vicious circle of the disease, have to be considered and potentially treated simultaneously. Therefore, establishing the role played by each of them in the clinical picture represents the basis of the therapeutic strategy. This allows the identification of the key factor(s) of DED in the single patient, which can be subsequently targeted while also taking into account other alterations. If there are two or more factors, a multiple strategy can be used. Furthermore, the most active factor can be selected and addressed first and/or more aggressively (figure 2).
For example, if significant inflammation of the meibomian glands (MGs) is present, stabilising the tear film without correcting the lid inflammation will be ineffective. In fact, MG changes will cause a disruption of the lipid layer stability, resulting in a reduced tear film break-up time and an inflammatory response in the conjunctival epithelium. Therefore, the main goal should be to reduce lid margin inflammation. This will include lid margin hygiene, corticosteroids/antibiotic ointment and eye drops, together with the use of tear substitutes in order to allow a more efficient control of the tear film stability. The choice of the tear substitute is also an important factor to consider: in this example, a low-viscosity formulation with limited retention time, thus able to dilute the pro-inflammatory agents present on the ocular surface and to increase tear clearance would be recommended.27– 29 The use of punctal plugs, even in the presence of poor tear volumes, should be avoided, as good clearance of the pro-inflammatory tear fluid is mandatory, together with efficient lid hygiene. However, a recent paper has demonstrated that the increase of tear inflammatory cytokine levels in patients with DED, treated with punctal plugs was temporary and returned to baseline after 3 weeks.30 Once lid margin inflammation is under control, the therapeutic strategy can be changed to address tear film instability and volume as well as epithelial protection, in order to further decrease inflammation. The addition of more viscous tear substitutes with osmo-protective activity can be used in conjunction with milder steroid eye drops. Punctal plugs, if still needed, could be taken into consideration, at this point, as a further tool.
Once a clinical improvement is achieved, a continued lid hygiene programme, including appropriate tear substitutes to prevent recurrence of the acute disease, would be mandatory. Timing of controls would be based on the presumed efficacy of the treatment used (table 1).
At the same time, the patient should be informed about the aim of the prescribed therapy that it could be changed based on the clinical results and that the treatment effect may take some time to manifest.
TREATING SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS
Diagnosis and subsequent treatment of DED can be extremely challenging due to a lack of a single clinical assessment and the wide variation in symptoms. In addition, patient-reported symptoms frequently do not correspond to observed changes in clinical signs.52 53 Tear substitutes have been traditionally used for the treatment of DED to improve symptoms. However, it is important to note that tear substitutes are not specifically designed to improve symptoms, but to prevent their build-up. Consequently, they should be instilled regularly throughout the day to avoid symptom aggravation and not used on an as-needed basis. It is also important to consider that some eye drop formulations may contain preservatives, which have the potential to adversely affect the ocular surface and induce noxious symptoms. In these situations, it is important to limit their long-term use.
To increase tear film stability, polymers such as hyaluronic acid have been suggested for use. These polymers allow the correction of the tear film volume and improve its functional characteristics by increasing the tear film volume, ocular surface wettability and fluid spreading. Recently, a new generation of multiple-action tear substitutes, made of a combination of polymers with different characteristics, was put on the market.29
Management of inflammation
Control of inflammation is considered mandatory in order to improve symptomatology. Direct inflammatory damage or lack of epithelial protection can make free nerve endings of the corneal epithelium more sensitive to normal and environmental stimuli, inducing neuropathic pain, a typical symptom of DED.54 However, the ability to immediately treat these symptoms is poor, which frequently leads to non-compliance due to lack of prompt effectiveness. Contact lenses (both scleral and silicone-hydrogel) as well as blood-derived eye drops have been suggested as possible treatments for this condition.51 55– 59 Another systemic approach addressing the central nervous system with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mimetic substances, used for peripheral pain, has also been suggested.60
The control and reduction of ocular surface inflammation, which may derive from epithelial damage and environmental stressors, is another key component of any treatment regimen. Corticosteroids are typically used in the treatment of ocular surface inflammation,31– 33 particularly milder corticosteroids such as those naturally produced by the ocular surface epithelium. Cortisol (called hydrocortisone, when used as a drug), which can be produced at the ocular surface by epithelial cells under certain physiological conditions, contributes to the regulation of inflammatory processes ordinarily occurring and acts as a protective mechanism against environmental antigens.61 62 Inflammation is an important contributor to the vicious circle of DED and is frequently the factor that causes the disease to become chronic. Therefore, controlling inflammation is fundamental to prevent and treat chronic DED.63– 66 Evidence suggests that long-term inflammation in DED elicits morphological and functional changes, which can lead to a change in the expression profile of inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1ɑ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, tumour necrosis factor-ɑ, matrix metalloproteinases). The expression of these and other molecules, such as intercellular adhesion molecule 1, may trigger, in case of prolonged stimuli, the activation of adaptive immune pathways with lymphocytes migrating to the conjunctiva and eliciting a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory response. Corticosteroid treatment with high-medium potency molecules has been demonstrated to be effective but with significant, serious side effects; therefore, their long-term use is not recommended. The use of mild steroids, such as hydrocortisone, is highly indicated for patients with DED, where a long-lasting anti-inflammatory treatment is advisable.34 This treatment can be considered safer than other types of corticosteroid molecules; however, it is always mandatory to check intraocular pressure and the lens status during the treatment.
Other molecules can be used to treat inflammation alone or in combination with corticosteroids.41– 43 Omega-3 fatty acids, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus and lifitegrast have all been indicated as possible treatments acting on specific aspects of inflammation. Omega-3 is a useful supplement able to address some aspects of inflammation through the formation of potent anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving lipid mediators.39 40 67 68 A recent study has demonstrated that the use of eye drops containing n-3 eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acids (DHA) has a positive effect on the entire ocular surface system and could be a complementary therapeutic strategy for the treatment of DED and photorefractive keratectomy.67
However, in a recent multicenter, double-masked clinical trial where moderate-to-severe DED patients were randomised to receive for 1 year, either a daily oral dose of EPA and DHA (treatment group) or olive oil (placebo group), there were no significant differences between the two groups for both the signs and symptoms of DED.69
Other molecules, including cyclosporine A, tacrolimus and lifitegrast act by inhibiting lymphocyte migration to the ocular surface but require a longer period compared to corticosteroids before they become effective in controlling inflammation.35– 38 65
The correct use of tear substitutes can play an important role in helping to achieve the control of the inflammatory process on the ocular surface: they improve tear fluid clearance and reduce the concentration of pro-inflammatory agents. This is in contrast to punctal plugs, which are used to prolong the permanence of tears on the ocular surface by inhibiting their clearance. Consequently, the use of punctal plugs should be reserved for conditions in which inflammation of the ocular surface is not present or upon patient request in specific social occasions like celebrations or extensive video terminal use. In these situations, punctal plugs use should be limited to short time periods.
Another pillar of DED therapy is epithelium protection, necessary to interrupt the vicious circle that is sustained by pro-inflammatory cytokines produced during epithelial damage. The protective physical and biological characteristics of some tears have been identified as a potential treatment to protect epithelial damage (table 2).46– 48 70– 88 Trehalose has been indicated as a possible therapeutic tool, able to interfere with the cellular metabolic dysfunction associated with DED and control inflammation. This naturally occurring sugar is a non-reducing disaccharide, found in high concentrations in many organisms, and is a key element involved in anhydrobiosis (ability to survive almost complete dehydration). Its presence also confers resistance to desiccation and high osmolarity in bacterial and human cells.79 80 Owing to these characteristics, trehalose was used to protect the amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction during the process of preservation.80 In addition, it has been hypothesised that the ability of trehalose to effectively control inflammation is due to the activation of the transcription factor E-boxB/autophagy cellular degradation pathway, which seems to be involved in the maintenance of corneal homoeostasis and suppression of cell death during an apoptosis-inducing inflammatory insult.47 48 88 It has been demonstrated that trehalose preserves the integrity of the cells and their intracellular organelles through multiple mechanisms, which are not yet fully understood.49 89
Hyaluronic acid is a strongly hydrophilic, non-sulfated, disaccharide, glycosaminoglycan, with a molecular weight ranging from <100 to >1000 kDa, occurring naturally in the human body.90 It is currently considered an essential component in tear substitution formulations, where it increases viscosity, improves retention time, and optimises ocular surface hydration and lubrication.91– 93 There are several formulations present on the market, particularly in Europe, which differ in concentration, molecular weight and viscosity, whereas in some products, additional components are added to sodium hyaluronate in order to address specific aspects of DED.29 Generally, viscous solutions may be useful to treat conditions where epithelial recovery is necessary, whereas less viscous eye drops are used when an increased tear clearance is required.
For a complete ocular surface treatment, other aspects must be taken into account, most notably, the meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)/blepharitis and nerve impairment.
To control MGD/blepharitis, several measures are necessary, including lid hygiene, by means of warm/hot compresses and medicated wipes, topical or systemic antibiotic treatments, anti-inflammatory agents and less viscous tear substitutes for increasing tear clearance. MGD and blepharitis are the consequence of MG disease: this can be isolated but is more frequently associated with skin alterations, indicating a general sebaceous dysfunction. Rosacea is a chronic skin disorder that affects the facial skin and is characterised by transitory vasodilation, persistent telangiectasia with papules and pustules. It is frequently accompanied by severe MGD and blepharitis, potentially leading to corneal neovascularisation in more advanced stages. To treat this condition, both oral tetracyclines (eg, minocycline and doxycycline) and topical anti-inflammatory treatments can be useful.44 45 A tapering course of potent corticosteroids can be used and, once the response is obtained, the anti-inflammatory treatment can be continued with milder corticosteroids in a lower dosage for long-term use (table 3).
The use of medium-viscosity formulation tear substitutes to increase tear clearance and stabilise the tear film is an important consideration in treating MGD/blepharitis. The frequency of instillation should be consistent (four to six times a day), with the aim of controlling symptom presentation. The ancillary use of eye drops containing resolvins that are molecules derived from omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, EPA and DHA is advisable (two to three times a day). Self-administered lid hygiene is mandatory and should be based on warm/hot compresses or heating goggles (Blephasteam) and medicated wipes. Recently, a new in-office treatment has been developed to safely administer therapeutic levels of heat and pressure (LipiFlow), which has demonstrated a higher and more sustained improvement in reducing both the signs and symptoms of MGD compared to conventional warm/hot compresses.94 Subjects with lid margin problems should be informed that their disease is chronic and caused by structural alterations of MG, which can be treated to reduce episodic flare-ups but cannot be completely resolved. In case of worsening, the administration of more potent drugs should be considered, followed by tapering and returning to baseline treatments once the relapsing episode is under control.
Recently, the use of intense pulsed light has been suggested and documented by the literature as a possible treatment of MGD.95– 97 However, further appropriately controlled studies are desirable to demonstrate that this method is more effective compared to correctly performed warm/hot compresses. Tolerance with this procedure may be an issue, with some patients reporting an increase in long-lasting ocular pain after the procedure, suggesting a possible interference with the sensitive nervous system. Furthermore, this method is not indicated in subjects with skin prototype VI or very dark skin where the results are poor.95
The last pillar of DED is neurological impairment, which is responsible for the frequent lack of correlation between signs and symptoms in patients. There is still a lack of treatments able to address nerve structures, although human recombinant nerve growth factor (NGF) is now on the market for neurotrophic keratitis and is under investigation in the USA and Europe for DED treatment.50 Several substances have been suggested and are currently used to improve ocular surface sensation. Among these, omega-3 derivatives seem to play a significant role in nerve protection and regeneration, when used either alone or in combination with NGF or pigment epithelium-derived factor.98– 101 The use of vitamin B12 has been proven in an animal model to improve both corneal epithelial healing and nerve regeneration,102 whereas sodium hyaluronate eyedrops containing vitamin B12 are commonly used for epithelial improvement.103 Other vitamins involved in ocular surface health are vitamins A and D used as oral supplements and vitamin A as a topical application, which have demonstrated an improvement in DED signs and symptoms.104– 107 Amino acid–enriched tear substitutes have been proven to be effective in improving corneal nerve structure in patients with DED.108
Possible future developments will consider the use of biological drugs in the treatment of DED and associated conditions such as psoriasis.109 110
The goal of treatment should be to improve patients’ signs and symptoms, while adapting the treatment is necessary in order to achieve good homoeostasis.
The relationship with the patient is also a crucial aspect of the treatment plan.
DOCTOR AND PATIENT RELATIONSHIP
Empathy and willingness to explain the disease with patients, who often fell isolated without much understanding and comprehension from both medical professionals and relatives, is an important part of the treatment process. Patients generally feel that their disease is impossible to treat, leading to non-compliance and discontinuation, which can perpetuate the vicious circle of ocular surface damage.
It is important that physicians explain that the disease is chronic, with the severity of signs and symptoms fluctuating depending on internal body circumstances and reactions to environmental conditions. Consequently, therapies will need to be monitored and adjusted if necessary. Critically, it needs to be stated that there will frequently be a time lag before any kind of improvement will occur, but that therapies will substantially improve their quality of life.
It is possible that the eyes will remain slightly more reactive to changes in the environment. Therefore, it should be explained that patients might need to modify the frequency and/or type of eye drops according to the change of symptoms, following a preplanned rescue prescription. In particular, patients should address a series of questions in order to self-monitor their condition, such as
Do I feel that I need a more suitable treatment compared to last week?
When I go outside?
When performing visual tasks (TV, computer, reading, driving)?
Am I feeling discomfort, heaviness or irritation in my eye?
If the patient responds to one or more of these questions with yes, it is reasonable to assume that the patient would need to increase the frequency of tear substitute instillation, enhancing/starting anti-inflammatory treatment or possibly a new course of antibiotics.
It is also important to schedule follow-up visits to demonstrate that the physician is managing the patients’ care and to discuss any issues with the treatment and adapt it if necessary. It is advisable, if the clinical conditions allow it, to initially schedule visits every 3 months, and then every 6 months. It is important to assure the patient that the physician will be ready to support them with any queries and schedule further visits if necessary.
In conclusion, dry eye is a multifactorial disease of the tears and the ocular surface, a system formed by several structures working together to protect the eye from excessive environmental and biological stress. It is therefore critical to treat the main pathogenic mechanism(s) involved in DED and to address also the secondary mechanisms that, if not appropriately controlled, might contribute to perpetuate the vicious circle of DED. A proper and adaptable treatment will improve the ocular surface inducing a relief from symptoms and an effective improvement of the quality of life.
Contributors PA, RM, PR, EC, MR designed and directed the project; all authors conceived the idea of the review; PA, GG, MR drafted the manuscript with input from all authors; RM, PR, EC provided critical feedback. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Funding This paper was supported by an unrestricted grant from Théa Farma S.p.A.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.