AIMS This study investigated the effect of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in patients with severe intracameral fibrin after extracapsular cataract extraction or phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.
METHODS A randomised prospective multicentre study was carried out in 86 patients with intraocular fibrin formation 2–8 days after cataract surgery. While the first group (n=41) received only anti-inflammatory drugs, a single anterior chamber injection of tPA (10 μg) as an additional treatment to the standard was given in the second group (n=44). On days 1, 2, 14, and 90 after randomisation, the visual acuities, slit lamp findings, and intraocular pressures were documented in standardised protocols. Efficacy of treatment was judged by the rate of fibrinolysis (primary objective), the frequency of synechiae, and central capsular fibrosis (secondary objectives).
RESULTS The incidence and quantity of intraocular fibrin were significantly lower in the patients treated with tPA than in the control group (p<0.05). The frequencies of synechiae were reduced by tPA injection. The capsule fibrosis noted after 3 months was significantly lower in the tPA group (p=0.027). No ocular side effects were noted after the tPA injections.
CONCLUSIONS Lysis of postcataract fibrin formation is accelerated and increased by a single intracameral injection of 10 μg tPA in addition to standard anti-inflammatory treatment. The findings suggest that the tPA injection reduces posterior capsule fibrosis, which still has to be addressed in larger study populations and with a long term follow up.
- tissue plasminogen activator
- cataract surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The incidence and degree of inflammation as a consequence of cataract surgery have decreased in recent years because of the surgical techniques that have evolved and improved intraocular lenses.1 Postoperative alteration of the blood-aqueous barrier, however, is inevitable. But this is usually easily managed with topical anti-inflammatory medication within several days. While fibrinous uveitis occurs in less than 3% of the cases after normal cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation,2fibrin exudation more frequently appears in children, in cases where there have been extensive surgical iris procedures, or in patients with diabetes or uveitis.3-6 This insoluble fibrin may eventually lead to synechiae, loss of pupillary function, membrane formation on the intraocular lens, IOL dislocation, or secondary glaucoma. Posterior capsule opacification, found in 15%–50% of the patients after cataract extraction, may also result from postoperative fibrinous reaction.1 Introduction of a potent fibrinolytic substance for the treatment of postsurgical fibrin formation therefore seems reasonable.
Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is a highly potent fibrinolytic protein.7-9 Its fibrinolytic activity is clot specific, which significantly decreases the risk of haemorrhages (Fig 1). Intravenous therapy with tPA has proved to be efficacious in coronary thrombolysis in patients after myocardial infarction.10 In several uncontrolled clinical trials intracameral tPA injections of 25 μg or less have been shown to lyse postcataract intracameral fibrin membranes.11-14
This prospective study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of anterior chamber injections of 10 μg tPA for resolution of severe fibrin formation following extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) or phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation (PC-IOL) in order to determine its effects on secondary complications such as synechiae or posterior capsule opacification and its tolerability.
Subjects and methods
Patients developing fibrin 2–8 days (mean 2.4 (SEM 1.2)) after ECCE or phacoemulsification with PC-IOL between October 1993 and May 1994 were included in this study. ECCE or phacoemulsification techniques were performed. Dexamethasone, 4 mg, was injected subconjunctivally at the end of the surgery. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study are listed in Table 1. A detailed review of systems and eye examinations was performed when the patients were recruited to this study, which was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki concerning medical research in humans. Patients were included in this study after informed consent was obtained.
The study was designed as an randomised prospective multicentre study. The postoperative treatment consisted of corticosteroids and antibiotic eye drops (four times daily, each) and ointment at bedtime, and of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops (four times daily). Patients with severe postsurgical fibrinous membranes or clots (Table 2) were assigned to one of the two study groups according to a randomisation schedule provided to each centre in advance. The frequency and dosage of topical steroids were adjusted as required in each case, and cycloplegics were added. While the standard treatment group continued with the anti-inflammatory regimen, the second group received in addition a single intraocular injection of 10 μg tPA. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was supplied by Basotherm GmbH, Biberach, Germany. Under sterile conditions, lyophilised tPA was dissolved in distilled water and buffer substance; 10 μl of the solution containing 10 μg tPA were injected into the anterior chamber under an operation microscope.
On days 1, 2, 14, and 90 after randomisation, applanation tonometry, visual acuity tests, and slit lamp examinations were performed. The eyelids, the conjunctiva, the wound area, cornea, anterior chamber, iris, IOL, and posterior capsule were evaluated in masked fashion. The findings were graded on scales and were documented in detailed standardised protocols (Table 3). The presence of intraocular fibrin was graded as slight (several fibrin strands), moderate (compact fibrin aggregates), or severe (fibrin membranes or clots).
The primary efficacy variable was the rate of fibrinolysis in the anterior chamber, on the IOL surface, or on the other intracameral structures. The secondary efficacy variables were the development of synechiae, regenerative secondary cataract, and central posterior capsule fibrosis. Any adverse events were reported, including patient complaints, physical signs, and diseases that occurred or worsened during the study period.
The statistical evaluation of the primary variable was performed by means of a χ2 test. The statistical analysis of the secondary variables was done with Student’st test and the Mann–Whitney U test; the frequencies were evaluated by means of a χ2 test. No interim analysis was performed.
Eighty six patients were enrolled in this study. These were approximately 2% out of the total number of cataract surgeries performed in the six centres during the study period. Forty four patients were in the tPA treated group and 41 patients belonged to the standard treatment group. One patient from the tPA group was excluded from the efficacy assessment, because he suffered from aphakia. One tPA treated patient and two patients treated with the standard treatment missed their appointments after 3 months. Two patients in the standard treatment group left the study after the day 14 visit because of rapid development of capsule fibrosis. The “last observation carried forward method” was employed for these missing data. Forty seven patients were women, 39 were men. The mean age was 69.5 years (SEM 12.2) and 72.1 years (12.6) in the tPA and standard treatment groups, respectively. The epidemiological, preoperative ocular characteristics or surgical methods did not differ significantly between patients in the tPA and control group.
Two and 14 days after treatment, the incidence and rate of intraocular fibrin, both in the anterior chamber or on the IOL surface, were significantly lower in the tPA treated group than in the control group (Table 4). Fibrinolysis was significantly accelerated by the additional tPA injection. The amount of fibrin present in individuals treated with tPA was significantly less at all follow up visits (Table 4B). The frequency of posterior synechiae to the intraocular lenses was reduced by the tPA injection, but the difference between groups did not reach the level of statistical significance (Table 5). The incidence of posterior capsule fibrosis did not differ between the two study groups at days 1, 2, and 14. The capsule fibrosis noted at the day 90 follow up visit in the tPA group was significantly less than in the patients treated with standard anti-inflammatory drugs (Table 6). In contrast, regenerative secondary cataract formation was similar in both study groups. The rates of capsule fibrosis or regenerative cataract formation did not differ between the six centres or the various surgeons involved in the study. The final visual acuities at day 90 after treatment were significantly better in the tPA treated group than in the cases in the control group (p<0.01; Table 7). The preoperative and postoperative anti-inflammatory regimens did not significantly differ between both groups.
All patients (n=86) were included in the safety analysis. Adverse events were found in three patients in each group, which could not be attributed to the ocular treatment. One patient in the tPA group suffered from fever and biliary colic, which required surgery. In a second case, chronic iritis recurred, and another patient suffered from varicosis of his leg. Two patients in the control group developed rapid capsule fibrosis, and posterior synechiae in the optical axis were seen in another. Hyphaema has not been observed in a single case followed up in this study. Corneal complications, wound healing problems, or disturbances in the intraocular pressure were not found in any of the patients. All of the other study variables listed in Table 3 did not differ significantly between the study groups at any of the follow up visits.
The high success rate of modern cataract surgery may be significantly impaired by postoperative intraocular fibrinous reactions and fibrin related complications. Since fibrin and fibrinogen degradation products promote chemotaxis and activation of intraocular inflammatory components15 or cellular transformation into fibrocytic cells,16 stabilisation of the blood-aqueous barrier function by anti-inflammatory drugs is the mainstay of current treatment. However, active fibrinolysis may be a more potent therapeutic option.
This is the first prospective randomised study on the use of tPA in patients developing severe intracameral fibrinous exudation after cataract surgery. The efficacy of 10 μg tPA administered by anterior chamber injection was assessed with regard to fibrinolysis, lysis of synechiae to the IOL, and development of posterior capsule fibrosis in comparison with a standard topical anti-inflammatory medical regimen. The results indicate that lysis of intracameral fibrin can be improved by the tPA injection. In tPA treated patients, fibrinolysis was completed within the first day in 40.9% of the cases, and in 93.2% of these patients within 2 weeks. In contrast, 95.1% of the patients in the control group still had significant intracameral fibrin deposition after the first day, and 24.4% even after 2 weeks. Our observation that tPA is highly effective for the acceleration of fibrinolysis is in accord with several previous experimental and uncontrolled clinical investigations.11 13 14 17-21
In our study, complete lysis of intracameral fibrin depositions was achieved with the use of only 10 μg tPA. Continued production or reaccumulation of fibrin after injecting the tPA has not been seen in any of our patients, which might be attributed to the continued treatment with anti-inflammatory medications. Especially with tPA dosages below 10 μg, repeated tPA injections have previously been necessary to achieve complete fibrinolysis.20 22 23 The rapid fibrinolysis seen in this and previous studies11 14 21 and the markedly diminished efficacy of tPA in cases treated several weeks after fibrin deposition24 are evidence in favour of prompt treatment with tPA in cases with severe postcataract fibrinous responses.
Regarding the lysis of visible synechiae, tPA injection was more effective than the standard anti-inflammatory treatment. The 80% success rate of synechiolysis in the tPA treated group noted after 3 months compared favourably with the 46.2% in the control group. The incidence of pupillary dysfunction, another supportive marker for fibrin deposition at the pupil and for posterior synechiae, increased in the standard treatment group, while it decreased in the tPA group (data not shown).
The study design presented here is closely reflecting the clinical setting that fibrin formation occurs under the perioperative use of anti-inflammatory medication. Although anterior chamber injections in postcataract patients already complicated by fibrin formation might induce additional inflammation and fibrin, this did not occur in this series. A randomised, double blind design including a control group injected with the vehicle alone is prohibited ethically for obvious reasons. However, it is highly likely that the difference between the tPA injected group and the non-injected group of patients found in the present study is attributed to the active ingredient. Although the topical corticosteroid treatment was not standardised, the dosages did not differ significantly between both study groups. Therefore, this did not introduce a bias to this study.
The most frequent complication after cataract surgery is posterior capsule fibrosis, which may occur in up to half of the patients.2 25 It is well known that secondary opacification of the posterior capsule is often caused by the proliferation of remnant or regenerated lens epithelial cells left in the capsular bag.26 There is, however, compelling evidence that proliferation, migration, and metaplasia of lens epithelial cells are related to postoperative disruption of the blood-aqueous barrier and are associated with exudation of fibrinogen and fibrin.5 27-31 While the transparent fibrinous membranes may not obscure vision, the newly formed fibrous tissue may result in significant visual impairment.26 32 Soluble fibrinogen not visible with the slit lamp is converted to fibrin. This is followed by platelet activation and by the secretion of platelet derived growth factor, which has a strong mitogenic effect on fibroblasts. In a second step, cells produce the extracellular matrix components. Experimental studies by Fourman and Wiley33 have provided evidence that tPA is able to reduce levels of those extracellular matrix components which are implicated in capsule fibrosis.34 Therefore, tPA may be a drug candidate for diminishing secondary cataract formation.
The observations in this study suggest that tPA treatment may reduce posterior capsule fibrosis. The reduced frequency and severity of posterior capsule fibrosis seen in the tPA treated group reached the level of statistical significance at 3 months after treatment. Accordingly, the final vision in the tPA treated patients was significantly better, while the preoperative visual acuities were similar in both study groups. However, this important issue must be addressed in future in larger study populations and with long term follow up, since the development of secondary cataract formation is highly variable, ranging from weeks to years. More accurate measures to judge capsule fibrosis, such as automated densitometry or contrast sensitivity, should be added to these studies. Based on our data, no conclusions can be arrived at as to whether or not treatment with intraocular tPA decreases the need for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy. Avoiding Nd:YAG capsulotomy and its serious complications35 would undoubtedly be attractive.
The consensus based on previous work and ours is that the injection of 10 μg tPA into the anterior chamber is generally well tolerated. No corneal complications were detected on slit lamp examination in our patients treated with tPA. In recent studies, no evidence of corneal endothelial damage has resulted from the intracameral use of tPA, even at high dosages.11 36 However, band keratopathy rarely occurred following tPA injection.37 The tPA treatment in this study has not been complicated by uveitis or disturbances in the intraocular pressure. In recent experimental studies, no toxic side effects were found after injecting 5–10 μg of tPA into the anterior chamber.38 Retinal toxicity in lensectomised and vitrectomised rabbits only occurred with intravitreal tPA dosages above 50 μg.39 No such side effects have been noted in our clinical study.
Several groups have reported severe bleeding complications after injecting tPA into the eye.20-22 This was especially true in cases with neovascularisation, iris surgical manoeuvres, cataract extraction combined with trabeculectomy or vitrectomy, uveitis, diabetes, after trauma, and when tPA was given immediately after surgery.20 22 40 In previous uncontrolled studies on the use of 25 μg tPA in patients with postcataract fibrinous membranes, hyphaema developed in 7.6%–10.5% of the cases.11 13Our data indicate that the use of intracameral injections of 10 μg tPA following the first postoperative day appears to be safe as far as the bleeding is concerned, and this is supported by previous uncontrolled reports.14 18 The bleeding complication, however, is evidence of the need to limit the dosage of tPA and to restrict its usage.
The potential advantage of epibulbar tPA delivery to the eye is that it diminishes the potential side effects. However, topical or subconjunctival tPA applications produced low and variable intracameral drug levels41 42 implying that this route of administration in the currently available formulations is unsuitable for this clinical purpose.
The authors have no commercial interest in the material used in the study.