Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Relation between pressure determined by ophthalmodynamometry and aortic pressure in the dog
  1. William H Morgan,
  2. Dao-Yi Yu,
  3. Valerie A Alder,
  4. Stephen J Cringle,
  5. Ian J Constable
  1. McCusker Glaucoma Centre, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Australia
  1. W H Morgan, McCusker Glaucoma Centre, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, 2 Verdun Street, Nedlands, WA, Australia, 6009.

Abstract

AIMS Ophthalmodynamometry has been used extensively since the last century; however, controversy surrounds what it actually measures. This study was set up to determine the relation between ophthalmodynamometric (ODP) and systemic blood pressures.

METHODS Aortic pressure was continuously monitored and altered by phlebotomy in six anaesthetised dogs, while ophthalmodynamometry was performed, by directly altering intraocular pressure. Maxillary artery pressure was monitored in two animals. All pressure transducers were zeroed at eye level.

RESULTS Mean ODP was 96.6% (1.6%) (95% confidence interval, n = 49) of aortic pressure. Mean maxillary artery pressure was 95.7% (5.5%) (95% CI, n = 16) of aortic pressure. ODP was 1.9 (0.6) mm Hg (95% CI, n = 33) higher than maxillary artery pressures.

CONCLUSION ODP was only slightly below aortic pressure and not significantly different from maxillary artery pressure, the analogue of the internal carotid artery in humans. These results also suggest a retinal artery collapse pressure of at least 1.9 mm Hg.

  • ophthalmodynamometry
  • dog
  • arterial pressure

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes