AIM To evaluate macular function before and after successful surgical closure of idiopathic macular holes using multifocal electroretinogram (ERG).
METHODS 40 patients (40 eyes) with idiopathic macular holes were examined using multifocal ERG both before and after vitreous surgery. The postoperative period was from 1 to 12 months.
RESULTS Preoperatively, the electrical retinal response densities in the foveal and the perifoveal area were apparently decreased. After a mean postoperative period of 3–6 months, the foveal and perifoveal area electrical retinal response densities improved to two to four times the preoperative level and the improvement continued to 1 year after surgery.
CONCLUSION In macular holes, the decrease in retinal electrophysiological response was not limited to the fovea but involved an area of the perifovea of 1.6 disc diameters. The electrical retinal response density of these areas gradually improved after macular hole closure.
- macular hole
- multifocal electroretinogram
- retinal response density
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Idiopathic macular holes are treatable with vitrectomy. After successful hole closure, most patients gain two or more lines of visual acuity until 6–12 months postoperatively, and resolution of metamorphopsia occurs. The mechanism by which visual function improves is not understood. Visual function before and after macular hole surgery generally is assessed by visual acuity measurement.1-6 However, the visual acuity level represents only a part of the impaired visual function resulting from macular hole development, which includes metamorphopsia, blurred vision, and scotoma. There have been few methods to evaluate these subjective symptoms. Some researchers used objective methods such as focal electroretinogram (ERG) to evaluate macular function,7-10 which reflects the different spatial distributions of the retinal receptors and supporting tissues. However, this method requires prolonged recording times and varying signal to noise ratios. Because focal ERG was designed to assess the macular area within 10 degrees, it cannot evaluate the electrophysiological response in the perimacular area. Multifocal ERG, introduced by Sutteret al,11 12 resolves these limitations, because multiple retinal locations can be tested simultaneously, and allows functional mapping of the retina.
Patients and methods
Forty eyes of 40 patients diagnosed with idiopathic macular holes in stages 2 to 4 (three, 34, and three eyes, respectively), according to Gass’s classification,13 14 were examined by multifocal ERG before and after vitrectomy. The ages of the patients ranged from 48 to 78 years (average 64 years). The macular holes were successfully closed in all 40 eyes. All the patients were examined and diagnosed by the same doctor (SK) before and after surgery and those who had apparent cataract was excluded from our study in order to avoid the cataract influence on our multifocal ERG study. Multifocal ERG were recorded preoperatively and 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. A visual evoked response imaging system (VERIS III, Tomey Corp, Nagoya, Japan) was used for the ERG recording. The multifocal ERG stimulus matrix consisted of 103 hexagons that scale concentrically and covered the central 50 degrees of the fundus area (Fig 1A). Each hexagon alternated between black and white in binary m-sequences at the rate of 75 Hz. The range of luminance levels is 5–200 cd/m2. The central hexagon (area 1, foveal area) corresponded to approximately 2.8 degrees of the fundus area. We used the cuneiform indicator rather than the pointer for fixation because patients had a central scotoma. A Burian–Allen bipolar contact lens electrode was used for signal derivation. A ground electrode was attached to the earlobe. The pupil of one eye was dilated with 0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride, and the fellow eye was occluded. The net recording time for each eye was 4 minutes; the entire procedure was divided into eight 30 second segments. The signal were amplified (100 000) and bandpass filtered (10–300 Hz). Three dimensional topography (Fig 1B) represented the retinal response density (amplitude per retinal area, nV/deg2). The recording procedure was repeated if there were spurious potentials from eye blinks or ocular movement were recorded.
The mean preoperative retinal response densities in 40 eyes with macular holes (three eyes with stage 2, 34 with stage 3, and three with stage 4) examined were 3.77 (SD 2.03) nV/deg2 in area 1 (foveal area of 2.8 degrees) and 3.82 (2.58) nV/deg2 in area 2 (perifoveal area of 3–9 degrees from the centre). At the examination performed 3 months postoperatively, the mean retinal response densities improved to 6.99 (2.69) nV/deg2 in area 1; 5.01 (2.54) nV/deg2 in area 2. Six months after surgery the mean retinal response density further improved to 8.27 (2.69) nV/deg2 in area 1 while the mean retinal response density in area 2 was at the same level (5.16 (2.38) nV/deg2). Figure 2 shows the relation of the retinal response densities in area 1 before and 6 months after surgery in the 40 eyes (rp=0.57, p<0.001). The retinal response density improved even in three eyes with unchanged visual acuity. Although a positive correlation was seen between the postoperative retinal response density and the visual acuity (rp=0.46, p<0.01), the retinal response density varied at wide range in eyes with the same visual acuity (Fig3).
The retinal response density gradually increased until 1 year postoperatively in six of the 40 patients who were examined by the multifocal ERG 12 months after vitrectomy. The mean central postoperative retinal response density (area 1) was 8.74 (2.45) nV/deg2.
A 75 year old man with a stage 3 macular hole in his left eye had a preoperative visual acuity level of 0.1. The topography of the retinal response density was markedly depressed in the macular area (Fig 4A, B). The retinal response density of area 1 was 4.14 nV/deg2. A multifocal ERG was repeated at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The retinal response density of area 1 improved to approximately 5.78, 7.76, 11.91 nV/deg2 accompanied by a visual acuity improvement to 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5, respectively. The postoperative changes of multifocal ERG topography are seen in Figure 4(C, D and E, F).
A 62 year old man with a stage 3 macular hole in his right eye underwent a preoperative multifocal ERG, the topography of which showed a marked central depression of approximately 8 degrees both in the hole and the surrounding area. The central retinal response density was 3.17 nV/deg2 preoperatively and improved to 9.12 nV/deg2 6 months postoperatively. The visual acuity improved from 0.1 to 0.4 (Fig 5).
The results of multifocal ERGs recorded preoperatively in 40 eyes showed marked decreases in retinal response densities that were not only limited to the fovea but also involved the perifoveal area. We previously observed the morphological features of macular holes using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.15 Henle’s fibre layer was elevated around the macular holes, forming radiating striae. They were seen in approximately 10 degrees of the perifoveal area in full thickness holes. The findings of optical coherence tomography indicated that the perifoveal radiating striae represent intraretinal splitting or retinoschisis.16 Decreased retinal response density in the perifoveal area (area 2) seems to reflect perifoveal retinoschisis.
The improvements in the retinal response density in the foveal area (area 1) appeared to reflect the closure of the macular holes with proliferated glial cells and centripetal displacement of surrounding photoreceptor cells.17 18 Resolution of the central scotoma seems to be attributed to anatomical repair in area 1. The radiating striae of the Henle’s fibre layer disappeared following macular hole closure.15 The improvement of retinal response density in area 2 along with resolution of metamorphopsia is presumably achieved by reattachment of perifoveal retinoschisis. The improvement of the retinal response density continued to 12 months postoperatively. The increases in the mean postoperative retinal response density in the 40 study eyes in area 1 indicate that the intraretinal neural network was restored with time after the closure of the macular holes.
The origin of the electrophysiological responses in the multifocal ERG remains controversial. Recently, some researchers studied the effect of filter bandwidth on the multifocal ERG.19 Other researchers recorded multifocal ERG in normal eyes and eyes with diabetic retinopathy.20-22 A multifocal ERG study in eyes with branch retinal artery occlusion demonstrated decreased electrophysiological responses in the ischaemic area,23suggesting that the multifocal ERG reflects not only the electrophysiological responses of cones but also that of the inner retinal layer including bipolar and Mueller’s cells. In eyes with macular holes, a decreased retinal response density seems to reflect the loss of photoreceptors in the fovea and the retinoschisis in the perifoveal area. Multifocal ERG is a useful method to evaluate retinal function in macular holes before and after surgery.
In full thickness macular holes, electrophysiological dysfunction was not limited to the fovea but involves its surrounding area. Reparation of the intraretinal neural network seems to continue up to 1 year after surgical closure of macular holes.
Presented in part on 14 May at the 1997 annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.