Download PDFPDF

Central corneal thickness determined with optical coherence tomography in various types of glaucoma
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Biometric aspects and comparison with published papers
    • , Ophthalmologist, Ophthalmic Surgeon
    • Other Contributors:
      • Richard Stodtmeister

    In the discussion Bechmann and colleagues mention the results of Ehlers et al[1] and compare them with the results of Whitacre et al[2] without regard for generally accepted principles of interpretation.[3] Some biometrical considerations will be found in the following. In figure 4 in the paper by Ehlers et al the correlation coefficient between the correction value and corneal thickness is 0.768...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Tonometry and central corneal thickness
    • , Ophthalmologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Yves C.A. Robert, Claude Kaufmann

    I read the article by Bechmann et al with interest, and I congratulate the authors on their work. In the discussion, they cover the entire subject of tonometry on the basis of the central corneal thickness (CCT). With the increasing number of corneal refractive procedures performed every year, this point will be associated with much uncertainty for diagnosing glaucoma in the near future. Appare...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.