Amblyopia: is visual loss permanent? | British Journal of Ophthalmology

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via AAO

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Responses

Original Article

Amblyopia: is visual loss permanent?

Free

Compose a Response to This Article

Compose Response

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

No

Please describe the competing interests

PLEASE NOTE:

A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.

I agree to and have read the terms and conditions for rapid responses and BMJ Privacy Notice *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Re: Amblyopia: is visual loss permanent?
Published on: 29 May 2001

Published on: 29 May 2001
Re: Amblyopia: is visual loss permanent?
- , Neurologist
- Other Contributors:
  CS Constantinescu
Dear Editor,
The paper by El Mallah, et al. [1], reporting visual recovery in the amblyopes after visual loss in the non-amblyopic eye brings new evidence for visual system plasticity extending beyond what was considered the critical period. Our observation of two patients presented below further supports it and suggests plasticity may be pharmacologically enhanced.
A 22-year-old woman with strabismic amblyopia...
Show More

Dear Editor,
The paper by El Mallah, et al. [1], reporting visual recovery in the amblyopes after visual loss in the non-amblyopic eye brings new evidence for visual system plasticity extending beyond what was considered the critical period. Our observation of two patients presented below further supports it and suggests plasticity may be pharmacologically enhanced.
A 22-year-old woman with strabismic amblyopia in the right eye (visual acuity 0.7) developed left optic neuritis with loss of acuity from 1.0 to 0.2. She received methylprednisolone 1 g/day i.v. for 3 days. Acuity improved over 2 weeks to 1.0 right (amblyopic) eye and to 0.8 in the left eye. The improvement was sustained over 2 years of observation. She subsequently developed definite multiple sclerosis (MS). The second patient was a 19-year-old woman with strabismic amblyopia in the right eye (visual acuity 0.2), and MS since age 8, with aggressive course after age 15. Frequent relapses, mainly myelopathic and cerebellar, responded to steroids. She had 3 days of i.v. steroids for a myelopathic relapse, and recovered. One month later she developed left optic neuritis (acuity 0.2). She noted an improvement in acuity (to 0.4) in the right eye. She received i.v. methylprednisolone for 3 days. Four weeks later, visual acuity had improved to 1.0 in the right eye but only to 0.3 in the left eye. A repeat course of steroids led to marginal further improvement in the left eye. The amblyopic eye recovery was sustained for over 18 months of follow-up.
These cases show that improvement in amblyopia can occur after optic neuritis in the fellow eye. The significant improvement may reflect the patients' younger ages, but also raises the fascinating possibility that pharmacological modulation with steroids may enhance or prolong the recovery effect. Other agents enhancing plasticity improve adult amblyopia [2], and steroids, which affect neural plasticity [3], may be a future consideration.
CS Constantinescu
I Gottlob
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
REFERENCES
(1) El Mallah MK, Chakravarthy U, Hart PM. Amblyopia: is visual loss permanent? Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:952-956.
(2) Gottlob I, Stangler-Zuschrott E. Effect of levodopa on contrast sensitivity and scotomas in human amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:776-780.
(3) Cameron SA, Dutia MB. Lesion-induced plasticity in rat vestibular nucleus neurones-dependent on glucocorticoid receptor activation. J Physiol (Lond) 1999;518:151-158
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top