BACKGROUND/AIMS Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) accumulate in the tears of patients with active peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) but it is unknown whether these enzymes have a central role in disease progression. The aims of the present investigation were to determine the source of these enzymes and to ascertain whether their accumulation in tears is a phenomenon specific to PUK or a general feature of other anterior segment diseases.
METHODS The experimental samples were obtained from the culture media of conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells, from fractionated blood plasma and leucocytes of healthy subjects and patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and from the tears of healthy subjects and patients with a variety of anterior segment diseases. The MMPs of all samples were visualised by zymography and tear samples were assayed using nitrophenol acetate and an MMP-9 susceptible quenched fluorescent peptide as substrate.
RESULTS The major MMPs that accumulate in the tears of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with active ocular disease are MMP-9 and a species ofMr 116 000. By comparing the zymographic activity profiles of the gelatinases present in the samples obtained, it was deduced that the main source of these MMPs was granulocytes. Their accumulation in tears was not unique to patients with PUK; detectable amounts of the enzymes also occurred in the tears of patients with keratoconus with associated atopic disease, patients undergoing treatment for herpetic eye disease, and patients with systemic and non-systemic dry eye disease.
CONCLUSION The MMPs that accumulate in tears are mainly derived from granulocytes. This may be effected by autoimmune diseases that involve ocular tissue or by ocular diseases that induce an inflammatory response.
- matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)
- tear film
- ocular disease
- corneal disease
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc and calcium ion dependent enzymes1 of differing substrate specificity but similar structure and catalytic mechanism.2 Physiologically, these enzymes participate in tissue remodelling3-5 and, pathologically, they cause disruption or disintegration of extracellular matrices.6-8
A well known ocular example of MMP induced pathology is peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). Signs of this chronic progressive corneal disease include peripheral thinning and the formation of a perforation prone gutter. End stage perforation is effected by the interstitial collagenase MMP-1 abnormally located in the cornea of patients with PUK.9 This enzyme, together with the collagenase produced by neutrophils and classified as MMP-8, are the only mammalian enzymes known to be capable of initiating hydrolysis of fibrillar type I collagen,210 the major component of the corneal stroma.
The gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 are enzymes that will hydrolyse type IV collagen, the major component of basement membranes.1112In addition to interstitial collagenase, these enzymes have been implicated in the early phase pathology of PUK.13 The suggestion that these MMPs may be involved in PUK is based on the observation that MMP-2 production is upregulated in keratocytes cultured from perforated corneas of patients with PUK, and the finding that the quantity of MMP-9 in tear samples taken from eyes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis is correlated with the extent of PUK progression in the corresponding corneas.
Because of the observed correlation between tear film MMP content and clinical evidence of PUK progression, it has been suggested that the zymographic visualisation of these enzymes in tears could be reliably used as a monitor of disease activity. However, although this is a possibility, to date there is no information pertaining to the source of these enzymes and whether their appearance in tears is specific to PUK. These questions have been addressed in the present study.
Possible sites of synthesis of the MMPs found in the tears of patients with PUK include the conjunctiva and corneal epithelium. To determine the range of MMPs produced by these tissues, their cells were cultured. In addition, because PUK is an ocular complication of rheumatoid arthritis, the possibility that the enzymes were produced by the activated inflammatory cells that accumulate at the limbus of the corneas of patients with active PUK was also considered. To investigate this, both healthy individuals and patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with or without associated ocular disease, provided tear and blood samples for MMP analysis.
To determine whether MMP accumulation in tears was a specific feature of PUK, tear samples were obtained from normal healthy individuals and from patients with various anterior segment diseases.
Conjunctival and corneal tissues
Conjunctival biopsy specimens were obtained from consenting patients with perforated corneas who were undergoing graft surgery. The corneas from which epithelial cell cultures were grown were obtained from the Bristol CTS Eye Bank. They had been rejected for transplantation because of a medical contraindication and permission to use the tissue for research purposes had been obtained.
Tear samples of five normal subjects and eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis (with or without an associated ocular disease) were collected on Schirmer test strips. These were placed in small sterile vials and stored at –20°C prior to analysis.
Tear samples from the remainder of the normal subjects and the patients with various anterior segment diseases were collected using small, fine tipped sterile pastettes and stored in Eppendorf tubes at –20°C. Prior to collection, 20 μl of a sterile solution of saline (0.9% w/v) was applied to the fornix of each eye.
Blood samples (5 ml) were taken from healthy individuals and patients with rheumatoid arthritis and collected in blood tubes containing citrate as the anticoagulant.
RELEVANT PATIENT INFORMATION
Sixteen normal healthy volunteers aged 21–61 years who were not taking any form of medication provided the blood and/or tear samples that served as the experimental controls.
To determine which MMPs were specifically produced by the conjunctiva and corneal epithelia, primary cultures of these cells were grown from the specimen tissues so that their secreted MMPs could be readily obtained from the culture media and analysed.
Corneal epithelial cell cultures
Corneal epithelial cell cultures were prepared by plating out explants taken from the anterior limbal regions of normal corneas in small petri dishes (5 cm diameter) and incubating them in RPM-I 1640 culture medium (Gibco Ltd) containing 5% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) at 36°C under 5% CO2. Once epithelial cell growth was established (∼ 7 days), the explants were removed to prevent the possibility of fibroblast proliferation. The medium was changed every 3–4 days. When near confluent, the cells were incubated for 4 days in serum-free culture medium. This was collected, centrifuged to remove any detached cells, and assayed for MMP activity.
Conjunctival cell cultures
The conjunctival biopsy tissues obtained from patients with PUK were placed in 25 ml tissue culture flasks in a small volume of Dulbecco's MEM medium (Gibco Ltd) containing an antibiotic, antimycotic mixture (Sigma), l-glutamine, and FCS (10% v/v). Once the tissue had adhered to the flask (∼1 hour) more medium was added to a final volume of 3 ml. As described above, the medium was changed every 3–4 days. When the cell cultures had achieved near confluence they were incubated in serum-free medium for a period of 4 days. This was collected for MMP analysis.
PREPARATION OF LEUCOCYTES AND PLASMA FROM BLOOD SAMPLES
To investigate the possibility that the MMPs present in tears were derived from inflammatory cells, the blood samples collected were fractionated so that the MMP content of granulocytes, monocytes, and blood plasma could be assayed individually. This was achieved by placing Histopaque 1119 (2.5 ml) in a 15 ml sterile tube, sequentially overlaying with the same volume of Histopaque 1077 (Sigma Diagnostics) and the 5 ml blood sample, and centrifuging at 700g for 30 minutes. During this time the erythrocytes pelleted at the bottom of the tubes and the granulocytes and monocytes packed at the Histopaque 1119/1077 and the Histopaque 1077/blood plasma interfaces, respectively.
Immediately after centrifugation the blood plasma, monocytes, and granulocytes were carefully and sequentially collected using sterile pipettes. The plasma was stored at –20°C until required for assaying. The monocytes and granulocytes were placed in sterile tubes containing serum-free MEM growth medium (2 ml) and pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. After washing the cells were transferred to 25 ml tissue culture flasks containing 2 ml serum-free MEM medium and incubated at 36°C under 5% CO2 for 7 days. The growth medium from each flask (containing ruptured cells and their liberated contents) was then removed, centrifuged at 18 000 rpm at 4°C to remove the cellular debris, and concentrated by centrifugation through a 10 000 molecular weight cut off Amicon filter. The concentrated soluble proteins of the monocytes and granulocytes were stored at –20°C prior to analysis.
DETERMINATION OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATION
The protein concentration of tears and the fractionated blood samples was measured spectrophotometrically using the following methods:
From the relation OD225 9.18 = 1.0 mg/ml.14 Reduced volume 1 cm path length quartz cuvettes were used and sample protein preparations were diluted with distilled water. The buffers in which the blood/tear samples were dissolved were similarly diluted to serve as blanks.
From a bovine serum albumin (BSA) calibration curve. Tear samples (diluted to 150 μl), together with solutions of BSA of known protein concentration (0–1 mg/ml) and prepared in the same buffer used to dilute the tears, were placed in the wells of a 96 well quartz plate. Their optical densities were recorded at 280 nm using a Spectromax spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). Protein concentration equivalence was determined from the constructed BSA calibration curves.
Some of the tear samples contained fluorescein and it was not therefore possible to determine their protein content by these methods.
MMP DETECTION AND ACTIVITY ASSAYS
Substrate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
SDS-gelatin polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (zymography) affects in situ activation of gelatinolytic proteases and was used to separate and visualise the gelatinase activities present in tear and fractionated blood cell and plasma samples. The protocol first described by Unemori and Werb15 was followed. All samples were analysed without heating or reduction. The tear samples collected on Schirmer test strips were prepared by wetting the basal 1 cm section of each strip with 5 μl SDS (5% w/v in H2O), placing them in the sample wells, and filling the wells with running buffer (0.05 M Tris glycine, pH 8.8, containing SDS 1% w/v). These samples contained the same volume of tears but not necessarily the same protein content. Other aqueous protein samples (tears, blood plasma, monocyte and granulocyte derived) were made up to similar protein concentrations in a final volume of 25 μl containing buffer (0.05 M TRIS HCl, pH 7.4, 10% glycerol) and 1% (w/v) SDS.
High molecular weight marker proteins (Sigma Chemical Co) were routinely included on each gel (120 μg/well) and electrophoresis was performed at 75V for approximately 2.5 hours. The gels were then removed from their casts, washed, and incubated sequentially at 37°C in Triton-X100 (30 minutes) and 0.05 M TRIS HCl, 5 mM CaCl2 (16 hours). After staining with Coomassie blue and destaining, the resolved gelatinase activities were visualised as white bands on a blue background.
Using dinitrophenyl acetate as substrate
Since acyl transfer is a property of all proteases and proceeds in the absence of peptidase activity, the production of dinitrophenol from dinitrophenyl acetate was used to compare the total amount of protease (active and inactive) present in tear samples.16 The assays were carried out in a total volume of 200 μl using 96 well plates. The reaction mixes contained 250 μM dinitrophenyl acetate, tear sample of known protein content, and 0.05 M TRIS HCl buffer, pH 7.4. The kinetics of dinitrophenol production were followed at 400 nm over a period of 20 minutes at 25°C using a Spectromax spectrophotometer.
Using Mca-Pro-Leu-Gly-Leu-Dpa-Ala- Arg-NH2 as substrate
The Gly-Leu bond of this quenched fluorescent peptide substrate17 may be cleaved by MMP-9 and MMP-2 when present in an activated form, free of their co-secreted inhibitory protein ligands known as TIMPs. To quantify the amount of activated enzyme present in tears, this substrate (40 μM) was incubated with the tear samples of known protein concentration in 0.05 M TRIS HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 5 mM CaCl2. The kinetic assays were carried out in a total volume of 150 μl in black 96 well plates at 25°C using a Molecular Devices Spectromax Gemini fluorimeter set at excitation and emission wavelengths of 345 nm and 396 nm, respectively.
ZYMOGRAPHIC SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF THE GELATINASE ACTIVITIES IN TEARS AND FRACTIONATED BLOOD PLASMA, MONOCYTES, AND GRANULOCYTES
All gels were photographed when fully destained using a polaroid camera and Kodak 665 negative film. The relative intensities/areas of the resolved gelatinase activities were subsequently determined by scanning the photograph negatives with a Biorad GS-690 imaging densitometer.
Since sample numbers were relatively low, values are expressed as mean (SD). Mean values for total protease specific activity and MMP zymographic activity were compared using the Student'st test for unpaired data.
INVESTIGATIONS RELATING TO SOURCE OF MMP FOUND IN TEARS
Characterisation of gelatinase activities secreted by conjunctival cells and corneal epithelial cells
To ascertain which MMPs are secreted by conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells, primary near confluent cultures of these cells were incubated for 4 days in serum-free growth media. These were harvested and analysed immediately by zymography. Representative gelatinase activity profiles obtained from the media samples of conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells are shown in Figure 1A and 1B, respectively. These data show that the major gelatinase produced by the conjunctival cells is inactive or proMMP-2 of Mr 66 000. In addition, the corneal epithelial cells also secreted proMMP-9. Although the published molecular weight of the latter MMP is 92 000,2 the protein co-migrated with the protein standard of Mr 97 000.
Evaluation of relation between MMPs of blood plasma and inflammatory cells and those in tear samples
In these experiments blood samples were obtained from five healthy individuals (age range 21–33 years) and from eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis with ocular complications (Table 1). Tear samples from these patients were collected on Schirmer strips. The zymographic gelatinase activities, resolved from the samples of tear, blood plasma and inflammatory cell incubation media, indicated the existence of four species of apparentMr 205 000, 116 000, 97 000, and 66 000. Of these, the protease associated with the band ofMr 205 000 was not, apparently, an MMP since its activity was not dependent upon Ca2+, nor was it inhibited by the metal ion chelator ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA). The other gelatinolytic proteases have been characterised as MMPs. The activity bands corresponding toMr 66 000 and 97 000 are known to be proMMP-2 and proMMP-9, respectively. The identity of the activity band of apparent Mr 116 000 is unknown. Representative zymograms of the MMP activities specific to the granulocytes, monocytes, blood plasma, and tears of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with active ocular disease are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that the tear gelatinase activity profiles, containing predominantly MMP-9 and the Mr 116 000 activities, are different from those obtained for the cultured conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells. Although they also differ from those of blood plasma (which contains mainly proMMP-2) and monocytes (which produce no Mr 116 000 activity but a significant amount of MMP-2), the tear gelatinase activity profiles closely resemble those obtained from ruptured granulocytes. These observations are backed by the data presented in Tables 3 and 4 which give mean densitometric estimates of the relative proportions of the three MMPs in granulocytes, monocytes, and blood plasma, and those in tears. Comparison of the ratios of the mean amounts of the MMP of Mr 116 000 and MMP-9 in the tear samples of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with ocular disease with those of their granulocytes, monocytes and blood plasma gives p values of >0.2, <0.005, and <0.001, respectively. Similarly, comparison of the ratios of the mean amounts of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the tear samples of these patients with those of their granulocytes, monocytes and blood plasma gives p values of >0.2, ∼0.005, and <0.001.
INVESTIGATIONS RELATING TO THE SPECIFICITY OF TEAR FILM MMP ACCUMULATION
The tear samples used for this study were all collected using small, fine tipped pastettes and diluted to150 μl with 0.05 M TRIS HCl, pH 7.4, 10% glycerol, before analysis. The individuals who donated these tear samples were grouped as follows:
1: healthy individuals (n=11; age 25–61 years).
2a: patients with keratoconus but no recorded history of atopic disease.
2b: patients with keratoconus and associated atopic disease.
3: patients with non-herpetic corneal keratitis.
4: patients with herpetic eye disease.
5: patients with dry eye (with or without systemic autoimmune disease).
Proteolytic enzyme content of the collected tear samples
The specific activities of all proteolytic enzymes present in the tear samples were calculated from the rate of hydrolysis of nitrophenylacetate and expressed as nmol/min/mg protein. The data obtained are given in Table 5 but could not be calculated for most of the patients in groups 4 and 5 because their tear samples contained fluorescein. Nevertheless, they show that the mean specific activities of the proteases present in the tears of patients in groups 2b, 3, 4, and 5 were higher than those of normal healthy individuals included in group 1 (p values of <0.001 were obtained for patients in groups 2b and 3 compared with normal individuals). The only patients whose tear protease content was comparatively low and similar to that of healthy individuals were those with keratoconus without atopic disease (group 2a).
Quantitative analysis of MMPs present in collected tear samples
The MMPs present in the tear samples, including those that contained fluorescein, were separated and visualised by zymography. Those of known protein concentration were applied to the gels at similar protein concentration. Tear samples containing fluorescein were applied to the gels in the median loading volume of the samples of known protein concentration. After electrophoresis, development of the gels, and obtaining their photographic negatives, the relative concentrations of the resolved MMP activities were measured by densitometry. These data are shown in Table 6.
The tear samples that contained appreciable quantities of the MMP ofMr 116 000 and MMP-9 were from patients in groups 2b (keratoconus with atopic disease), 4 (herpetic eye disease), and 5 (dry eye with or without systemic autoimmune disease). With one exception, little or no zymographic MMP activity was detected in the tear samples of the normal subjects. The tear samples of patients in group 2a (keratoconus with no atopic disease) contained small amounts of the MMP of Mr 116 000 and MMP-9 and the mean values obtained were slightly higher than those calculated for the tear samples of healthy subjects (p=0.06 and 0.02, respectively). The other tear samples that contained low levels of these MMPs were, with the exception of the patients with acanthamoeba keratitis, from those in group 3 (patients with non-herpetic corneal keratitis). Since relatively high levels of general proteolytic activity were detected in the latter tear samples, they may have contained proteases other than MMPs. On the other hand, the measured protein content of these samples was, for unknown reasons, only one third of that found in the tears of normal healthy subjects (data not shown).
Peptidase activities of the MMPs present in the collected tear samples
To determine whether activated MMP was present in the tears of patients with anterior segment disease, a selection of the tear samples collected was assayed against the MMP-9/MMP-2 susceptible quenched fluorescent peptide. The results obtained are shown in Table 7. Of the tear samples assayed, only those that exhibited the highest overall protease and zymographic MMP activities contained activated enzyme and were from patients with keratoconus with atopic disease (group 2b) and from individuals with herpetic eye disease and cicatricial conjunctivitis. However, although activated MMPs were detected in these tear samples, their specific activities were extremely low compared with that of a commercially obtained preparation of activated MMP-2.
Non-infectious ocular conditions that cause corneal thinning include those associated with rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic autoimmune diseases and result in corneal perforation (such as PUK) and those that progress independently of the immune system and do not result in perforation (such as keratoconus). Given this, it is apparent that inflammatory cells play an essential part in corneal perforation. It is also apparent that perforation requires the presence of an enzyme that can hydrolyse type I collagen, the main structural component of the corneal stroma. To date, the only known mammalian enzymes that are capable of achieving this are neutrophil collagenase (MMP-8, produced by neutrophils) and interstitial collagenase (MMP-1, produced by macrophages and fibroblasts).2 Which of these collagenases may be involved in the destruction of the cornea remains unknown. There is reliable evidence that macrophages penetrate the corneas of patients with PUK and, although MMP-1 has been immunologically detected in these corneas,9 it has also been reported that this is an endogenous enzyme synthesised by keratocytes.1819Although our own data do not support the latter of these possibilities, we have observed upregulation of MMP-2 production in keratocytes derived from PUK corneas and an accumulation of MMP (mainly MMP-9) in the tears of patients with active disease.13 The present investigation was initiated to establish the source of the tear film MMPs and to determine whether they may be directly involved in PUK and other ocular disease processes.
To investigate the source of the tear film MMPs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with ocular complications, the zymographic activity profiles of the MMPs present in their tears were compared with those of the MMPs secreted by conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells and those of the MMPs obtained from fractionated blood plasma and leucocytes (granulocytes and monocytes). The tear samples were collected on Schirmer test strips and their zymographic activity profiles contained an MMP of Mr116 000, MMP-9 and, in low abundance, MMP-2. The zymographic activity profiles of the MMPs found in blood plasma and in the culture media of conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells precluded the possibility that these tissues were the source of the tear film MMPs. The lack of the Mr 116 000 activity in the zymographic activity profile of the MMPs obtained from monocytes also indicated that these inflammatory cells contributed little to the complement of MMPs found in tears. Interestingly, however, it was noted that the specific activities of MMP-9 and MMP-2 recovered from monocytes of rheumatoid patients were significantly less than those of the enzymes recovered from monocytes of healthy subjects. Such differences were not observed when the specific activities of the individual MMPs recovered from granulocytes of normal subjects and patients with rheumatoid arthritis were compared, but the MMP profiles of these blood cells were virtually identical to those of tear film MMPs. It was therefore concluded that the granulocytes are the main source of MMPs found in tears of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. There exists the possibility that these enzymes are contained within granulocytes in tears. It is considered more likely that they are free in solution in the tear film and derived from granulocytes attracted to sites of inflammation either by external agents or by autoimmune disease.
Analysis of tear samples of patients with a variety of anterior segment diseases other than PUK indicated that the phenomenon of MMP accumulation was not unique to this disease. Initial experiments, in which the overall protease activity of the tear samples that did not contain fluorescein was measured, indicated that they divided into two groups of either low or high specific activity. The tear samples of low protease specific activity were obtained from normal healthy individuals (group 1) and patients with keratoconus without atopic disease (group 2a). With the exception of a tear sample from one of the normal participants, these tear samples also contained little zymographic MMP activity. Conversely, with the exception of most of the tear samples of patients in group 3, those of high protease specific activity also contained appreciable quantities of proMMP-9 and the species of Mr 116 000. These tear samples were collected from patients with keratoconus with atopic disease (group 2b), those with herpetic eye disease (group 4), dry eye (group 5), and the patients with acanthamoeba keratitis included in group 3.
Previous work in which the tears of patients with PUK were assayed zymographically using a variety of collagenous substrates provided no evidence for the existence of activated MMP.13 To ascertain whether any of the tear samples collected for this investigation contained activated enzyme, some were assayed against an MMP-9/MMP-2 susceptible quenched fluorescent peptide substrate. Of these tear samples, the few that exhibited activity, albeit low, included those of the patients with keratoconus who had the highest zymographic MMP activities and patients with herpetic eye disease (disciform keratitis) and cicatricial conjunctivitis. In considering the mechanisms by which MMP activation could have occurred, we have found that the serine protease elastases fromAcanthamoeba sp and neutrophils are capable of activating corneal keratocyte secreted MMP-2 (unpublished data). Other authors have also found that similar bacterial enzymes (such asPseudomonas elastase) may cleave the autoinhibitory N-terminal peptide from proMMPs2021 and implicated polymorphonuclear (PMN) leucocytes in MMP processing. Apparently, O• and NO• may be generated by activated macrophages and PMNs as a result of immunological responses to proinflammatory cytokines, and these free radicals may attack the cysteine bonded active site zinc ion.21 In addition to activating MMPs, free radical nitration and oxidative reactions presumably could also affect inactivation of the MMP inhibitors known as TIMPs and the breaching of epithelial cell barriers if these cells were the target of inflammatory cell attack in systemic disease. There is some evidence that surface proteins of epithelial cells are targeted by circulating antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.2223 If this were the case, once their basement membranes had been accessed and disrupted by the action of the inflammatory cell gelatinolytic MMPs or autoactivated endogenous MMP-9/MMP-2, macrophages would be free to invade the corneal stroma and there liberate their matrix degrading enzymes, particularly MMP-1. This hypothetical mechanism of PUK progression would partly explain why the corneas of patients with keratoconus and, for example, severe vernal or allergic conjunctivitis may be surrounded by inflammatory cells and an activated gelatinolytic MMP, but are not invaded by these cells and do not perforate.
In conclusion, it has been shown that the tears of patients with anterior segment diseases induced by systemic disease or those that induce an inflammatory response contain MMP-9 and an MMP ofMr 116 000. The main source of these enzymes appears to be the granulocyte fraction of white blood cells that accumulate at sites of ocular inflammation. In some cases a small proportion of the detected enzyme existed in an activated form. While this MMP may contribute to the breakdown of tear film proteoglycan, it is considered likely that its overall contribution to ocular disease processes is minimal. The inflammatory cell MMPs that cause major ocular tissue disruption and can activate endogenous MMPs are probably those that are produced and remain within the tissue that the inflammatory cells have invaded.
The authors are very grateful to the National Eye Research Centre (NERC) for financial support.