Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 7 January 2002
- Published on: 21 December 2001
- Published on: 7 January 2002Re: Amniotic membrane transplantation in acute ocular burnsShow More
Dear Editor
We are grateful to Dr Anita Panda and colleagues for supporting our work and comments made in the above article (Panda A eletter BJO 21st December 2001.
A new classification to include all the variables expanded on by ourselves and by Panda A et al in the eletter is indeed essential and has been proposed by us and published in the British Journal of Ophthalmology[1]. It is very important t...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 21 December 2001Amniotic membrane transplantation in acute ocular burnsDear EditorShow More
We read with interest the article titled "Failure of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in the treatment of acute ocular burns" by Joseph et al[1]. It is to be appreciated that they have come forward to report the negative results of their study along with the need of an upgraded classification for the chemical burn. The authors must be congratulated for highlighting the pitfalls of the AMT in acute cases w...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.