Download PDFPDF

Astigmatism and the analysis of its surgical correction
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Analysis of astigmatism correction: Authors' reply
    • Nigel Morlet
    • Other Contributors:
      • Darwin Minassian, and John Dart

    Dear Editor

    Thank you for the opportunity to reply to the letter from Dr Alpins concerning our recent article "Astigmatism and the analysis of its surgical correction".[1] Noel Alpins is a widely respected contributor to many international meetings, having written comprehensively on the use of astigmatism vector analysis. His software program ASSORT TM is widely used for the planning of refractive surgery a...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    A re-analysis of astigmatism correction
    Dear Editor

    In a recent "Perspective" article by Morlet et al titled "Astigmatism and the analysis of its surgical correction" [1] there are a number of omissions and fundamental errors of content that lead to erroneous conclusions. These significant inaccuracies overlooked in the review process compromise the article's broad contribution.

    In Dr Morlet's attempt to detail "the use and limitations of vector...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.