Responses

Download PDFPDF

Evaluation of corneal graft rejection in a mouse model
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Corneal opacification following keratoplasty in the rat model
    Dear Editor,

    I read with great interest the excellent perspective by Plsková et al1 in which they raise the issue of transient corneal opacification following corneal transplantation in the mouse model and argue that it might be due to a sufficient number of endothelia[l] cells regaining function.

    What the authors describe for the mouse model, also occurs in the rat model. In fact most researchers in the rat model pr...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.