Responses

Download PDFPDF

Visual results and complications of temporal incision phacoemulsification performed with the non-dominant left hand by junior ophthalmologists
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Temporal incision in all eyes using dominant hand

    Dear Editor

    2 We read with keen interest the paper by Kageyama et al,[1] which analyzed the results of performing phacoemulsification with dominant versus non-dominant hand. The results were also interesting; vitreous loss was higher with dominant hand group (5.9% vs.3.4%) and opposite in case of endothelial cell loss. Even though vitreous loss has been similar to a few other reports of conventional superior inc...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.