Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Optic disc cup slope and visual field indices in normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucomatous eyes
  1. A B Cullinane,
  2. A Waldock,
  3. J P Diamond,
  4. J M Sparrow
  1. Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Mr A Cullinane, Bristol Eye Hosptial, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX, UK; abcullinane{at}


Aim: To evaluate the correlation between internal slope analysis of the optic nerve head and visual field changes in normal eyes and those with ocular hypertension (OHT) and early glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: One eye of each of 22 normal subjects, 21 patients with ocular hypertension, and 50 patients with glaucoma were examined using the TopSS scanning laser ophthalmoscope. A series of topographic parameters measuring the internal features of the optic discs of these patients were obtained. These findings were compared with the Humphrey visual field analysis of these patients.

Results: Global topographic average slope and cup to disc ratio could discriminate between groups of normal and OHT patients (p = 0.02). All global and sector analysis parameters could discriminate normal subjects from POAG patients. The average slope parameter provided the best separation with a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.88. Visual field mean deviation (MD) was most closely correlated with global average slope (r = −0.60, p<10−7) and cup to disc ratio (r = −0.40, p<0.001). Visual field MD was also well correlated (r = −0.50, p<0.0001) with slope parameters for sectors S8, S2, and S1.

Conclusion: Average slope, a parameter independent of reference planes and magnification effects, is capable of discriminating groups of OHT and POAG patients from a group of normal subjects. This topographic parameter is also well correlated with the visual field MD. Sector slope analysis suggests early glaucomatous damage may occur in the inferotemporal region of the optic disc.

  • scanning laser ophthalmoscope
  • glaucoma
  • optic disc slope
  • visual field
  • CDR, cup-disc ratio
  • HRT, Heidelberg retinal tomograph
  • MD, mean deviation
  • NRRA, neuroretinal rim area
  • OHT, ocular hypertension
  • PSD, pattern standard deviation
  • POAG, primary open angle glaucoma
  • ROC, receiver operating characteristic
  • SLO, scanning laser ophthalmoscope

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Current literature suggests that a significant degree of optic nerve fibre loss precedes visual field defect formation in patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy.1–,3 A study by Sommer et al4 found that nerve fibre layer defects were detectable up to 6 years before visual field loss could be clinically demonstrated. In order to examine for optic nerve head changes, the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) has become a useful tool in the morphological assessment of the optic nerve head.5 Area and volume derived topographic parameters have been studied extensively for their ability to discriminate normal eyes from those with glaucoma,6–,8 but only a handful of studies have examined the slope measurement parameter of the optic disc cup. Dong et al,9 using sector based slope, and Caprioli et al,10 using peripapillary slope measurements, have examined this function in separating normal from glaucomatous eyes. However, the correlation between visual field indices and slope values have not been previously examined. In the knowledge that disc slope changes may occur before visual field change, this study examines for the relation between this parameter and visual field indices in a population of normal, ocular hypertensive, and early glaucoma patients, all having a visual field mean deviation better than −4 dB.


Three age and sex matched white groups consisting of normal subjects (n = 22) and patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) (n = 21) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (n = 50) were recruited at Bristol Eye Hospital. Patients with OHT and POAG were recruited from the glaucoma clinic, while normal subjects were recruited following advertisements in the local media. These had an age range from 49 to 89 years. The mean age for each group was 62 years (normal), 67 years (ocular hypertensives), and 68 years (glaucoma) respectively. This prospective cross sectional study was approved by the ethics committee for the United Bristol Healthcare Trust and informed consent was obtained from all of the patients. One eye was randomly selected from each subject before entry into the study and only eyes with a spherical equivalent between −5 and +5 dioptres were included.

Normal subjects were included in the study if there was no family history of glaucoma and they had had no intraocular pressure rise or ocular trauma in the past, a best corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better, normal anterior segments on slit lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure of less than 22 mm Hg (Goldmann tonometer), normal optic nerve head appearances on stereoscopic optic disc photography, and no glaucomatous visual field defects on Humphrey 24-2 full threshold automated perimetry. Ocular hypertensive subjects were the same as for the group of normals but with intraocular pressure greater than 21 mm Hg on two separate occasions.

Primary open angle glaucoma patients were included if they had a best corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better, anterior segment examination which confirmed open angles but did not demonstrate pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion, had glaucomatous changes to the appearance of their optic nerve heads on stereoscopic optic disc photography, and had visual field abnormalities consistent with glaucoma. These visual field defects were defined by at least three adjacent points 5 dB or more below the normal with a Humphrey 24-2 full threshold program.

Only patients with visual field deviation scores better than −4 dB were included. A reliable visual field test for study eyes in all groups was defined as one with fewer than 15% false positive responses, fewer than 15% false negative responses, and fewer than 20% fixation loses.

The optic disc measurements were obtained by one examiner using the TopSS confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (Laser Diagnostic Technologies Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). The details of this imaging system have been described elsewhere.9,11 In this study the scan angle was set at 10° and scan depth and scan offset were adjusted to 3 mm and position 3 respectively. Baseline images were made using the average of three consecutive images. The optic disc margin was defined by changing the shape of an ellipse and fitting the best ellipse around the inner border of the scleral ring. The cup margin was defined by an offset of 100 μm below the retinal reference plane. The following optic disc parameters were obtained: mean contour depth, cup shape, cup area, half depth area, cup/disc ratio (CDR), area of neuroretinal rim, volume above, volume below, half depth volume, average depth, maximum depth, average slope, and maximum slope.

The defined area of interest (optic disc) was also divided into 12 equal sectors, thereby allowing a sector value for each of the aforementioned parameters to be calculated. Sector slope values were calculated as described previously.9 Briefly, the software calculates the central point of the defined area of interest (C1). A line that connects a measurement point or pixel, P1, with the centre of the area of interest C1 is then formed. Along this line, the software finds the depth values of the points that are at a horizontal distance of 60 μm central (P2) to and 60 μm peripheral (P3) to P1 along this line. Angular slope (degrees) is calculated using the formula: slope= abs (atan((P2 − P3)/120 μm)). This is repeated for all points and the values of the slope for every point within the global area of interest or sector are averaged to calculate the respective global average slope or sector slope values. Sector 1 was located in the superior nasal meridian of the disc; sectors 1–12 were numbered clockwise for right eyes and anticlockwise for left eyes. Receiver operating characteristic curves, Student's t test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient r were used in statistical analysis.


There was no statistically significant difference found in age or refractive error between the groups. The mean deviation values measured by Humphrey 24-2 full threshold program ranged from +2.87 to −3.89 for the 93 subjects. The global demographic data for each group (mean (SD)) are presented in Table 1. The mean deviation values of the normal group and the groups with OHT and POAG were 0.75 (0.74) dB, 0.54 (1.11) dB and −1.6 (1.49) dB, respectively. Optic disc area failed to separate any of the groups. A significant difference was found in visual field mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) between normal and POAG patients (p<10−7 and p<10−5 respectively) and between OHT and POAG patients (p<10−6 and p<10−4 respectively). However, MD and PSD failed to significantly separate the normals from the OHT group. (p=0.5 and p=0.3 respectively).

Table 1

Global demographic data in normal (N), ocular hypertensive (OHT), and early glaucoma (POAG) subjects

Table 2 illustrates the global topographical data and demonstrates that discrimination of groups of normal from OHT patients was possible with the average slope parameter (p=0.017) and cup to disc ratio (p=0.022). All other global optic disc parameters could not discriminate between these two groups. Average slope, cup to disc ratio, and neuroretinal rim area significantly separated the OHT from the POAG groups (p=0.016, p=0.013, p=0.027 respectively). There were statistically significant differences found between the normal eyes and those with POAG for all SLO global morphological parameters. The most highly significant difference (p<10−8) was found in the average slope values for the normal and POAG group. Specificity and sensitivity values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The largest ROC curve areas were found for global average slope (0.88), cup-disc ratio (CDR) (0.83) and neuroretinal rim area (0.77). These findings are shown in Figure 1 and in Table 3.

Table 2

Global SLO topographical parameters in normal (N), ocular hypertensive (OHT), and early glaucoma (POAG) subjects

Table 3

Individual sector slope data in normal (N), ocular hypertensive (OHT), and early glaucoma (POAG) subjects

Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic curves (and areas) for the best separating parameters between the normal and primary open angle glaucoma groups. (Global average slope (slope), continuous line; cup-disc ratio (CDR), dotted line; neuroretinal rim area (NRRA), broken line.)

Table 4 illustrates the results of sector data analysis. S8 slope (inferotemporal) is the only sector value which significantly discriminates the normal and ocular hypertensive groups (p=0.025). All sector slope values separated the OHT from the POAG groups except sectors S3–S5, with sector 7 slope (inferotemporal) having the greatest separation (p=0.0009) All sector slope parameters discriminated the normal group from the glaucoma group but this separation did not exceed that obtained with the global average slope parameter.

Table 4

Sensitivity and specificity data of global topographical parameters between normal and early glaucoma subjects (n=72)

Table 5 presents the SLO parameters which demonstrate a statistically significant correlation (Pearson's r) with visual field indices. These included average slope, maximum depth, cup-disc ratio, average depth, neuroretinal rim area, effective area, volume above, and volume below. Disc area, half depth area, and half depth volume failed to show any correlation. Among the highest individual correlations found were those between visual field MD and cup-disc ratio (r = −0.40, p<0.001) and MD and maximum depth (r = 0.42, p<0.001), with MD and global average slope demonstrating the highest overall correlation (r = −0.60, p<10−7).

Table 5

Correlation between Humphrey visual field indices and global SLO topographical parameters in a population of normal, ocular hypertensive, and early glaucoma subjects (n=93)

Sector data analysis (Table 6) illustrates moderate correlations between individual sector slopes and MD with S8, S2, and S1 having the higher correlation values (r = −0.56, r = −0.53 and r = −0.52 respectively (p<0.0001)). All other SLO sector parameters were found to have a lower correlation with visual field indices than sector slope in terms of both Pearson's r value and significance (data not shown).

Table 6

Correlation between Humphrey visual field indices and individual sector slope data in a population of normal, ocular hypertensive, and early glaucoma subjects (n=93)


Studies using the confocal SLO have previously demonstrated global optic disc parameters to be of use in discriminating normal from OHT or POAG eyes.12–,14 However, many of these parameters have the limitation of being dependent upon the definition of a retinal reference plane or reference cap. It has previously been suggested that the retinal reference plane may be displaced downwards during glaucoma progression due to retinal nerve fibre layer thinning.10,11 This may have the erroneous effect of increasing the value of volume parameters derived from height measurements. In addition, optic disc size and image magnification or minification secondary to refractive power of the eye may influence area dependent parameter calculations, in particular neuroretinal rim area, cup-disc ratio, and effective area.15–,17

Dong et al9 have demonstrated the potential of the slope parameter in discriminating between normals and ocular hypertensives or glaucoma suspects. This parameter has the advantage over other parameters in that it is independent of all of the above variables. In this study we have assessed this parameter to discriminate between groups of normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucoma patients. Furthermore, we have also evaluated the correlation between this independent parameter and visual field indices.

This study confirms that most global topographic parameters can discriminate between groups of normal and early glaucoma patients, the greatest separation being achieved by utilising the average slope parameter, which was found to have a ROC curve area value of 0.88. The ROC values found in our study are similar to those found in previous studies of comparable size which examined optic disc morphology using the Heidelberg retinal tomograph (HRT). Zangwill et al18 found that the mean height contour parameter had a ROC curve area value of 0.86, while Vihanninjoki et al19 found that CDR was the best separating parameter with an area of 0.88. In a large study involving 226 subjects, Iester et al20 demonstrated that the largest ROC curve areas were found for cup shape measure (0.812), neuroretinal rim area (0.809), and CDR (0.804). It must be noted that in these studies, which used the HRT instrument, internal cup slope was not routinely calculated. Caprioli et al,10 however, in an attempt to create a parameter independent of the retinal reference plane calculated the slope of the peripapillary nerve fibre layer and found an ROC curve area of 0.86.

Only average slope and CDR could significantly separate the group of OHT patients from the group of normal subjects. These two parameters could also discriminate the POAG from the OHT groups. Although these parameters have been shown to be very reproducible,9,21 it is the average slope function which has the advantage of being independent of the retinal reference plane and any possible magnification effects. In addition, in this study we have demonstrated a highly significant correlation between global average slope and visual field mean deviation. This outperforms all other global parameter measures including CDR.

Dong et al9 demonstrated that sector slope analysis is reproducible and may discriminate between groups of normal subjects and OHT or glaucoma patients. Our findings confirm that sector slope analysis can discriminate between groups of normals and early POAG patients. However, we have found that it is only the inferotemporal slope (sector 8) which significantly separates the ocular hypertensives from the normal group. Furthermore, this sector (S8) also has the highest correlation with visual field mean deviation on individual sector analysis.

This observation suggests that sector slope steepening in this area may be the first optic nerve head morphological change in early glaucoma. These findings are slightly different from Dong et al,9 who reported that steepening of the nasal inferior sector slopes (S5 and 6) may be the first indicator of glaucomatous nerve damage. Early inferotemporal slope change is consistent with the findings of Tuulonen and Airaksinen,22 as well as observations reported by Jonas in two studies.23,24 This pattern of early sector 8 slope steepening is also consistent with previous visual field studies where perimetric focal defects in early glaucoma have been found to begin in the upper nasal field quadrant.25–,27

In summary, we have confirmed previous research highlighting the ability of internal cup slope to discriminate between groups of normal, OHT, and POAG eyes. This parameter performs better than other topographic parameters and it is independent of the limitations linked to those parameters. Furthermore, we have demonstrated its correlation with visual field mean deviation and the superiority over CDR in discriminating early POAG and OHT patients from normals. It also appears that all sector slope values are useful, in particular the inferotemporal sector slope, which may be an effective measurement parameter in the early detection of optic disc damage in glaucoma. The role of internal cup slope in the determination of glaucomatous progression is currently being evaluated.