Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Understanding the molecular genetics of congenital cataract may have wider implications for age related cataract
  1. A T Moore
  1. Correspondence to: A T Moore Institute of Ophthalmology, Division of Inherited Eye Disease, Bath Street, London, EC1V 9EL, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Treatment to slow down the progression of cataract would have a significant effect on the demand for cataract surgery

Congenital cataract, although uncommon, accounts for about 10% of childhood blindness.1 The cataract is usually seen as an isolated abnormality but may occur in association with other ocular developmental or systemic abnormalities. About 50% of bilateral cases have a genetic basis. Congenital cataract is both clinically and genetically heterogeneous; isolated congenital cataract is usually inherited as an autosomal dominant trait although autosomal recessive and X linked inheritance are seen less commonly.2 Most progress has been made in identifying the genes causing autosomal dominant congenital cataract.2 Two main approaches have been used to identify the causative mutations. In large families linkage analysis has been used to identify the chromosomal locus followed by screening of positional candidate genes; most genes have been identified using this strategy. A second approach has been to screen DNA from large panels of patients with inherited cataract for mutation in the many candidate genes available.

The α, β, and γ-crystallins are stable water soluble proteins which are highly expressed in the lens; they account for about 90% of total lens protein, have a key role in lens transparency, and thus represent excellent candidate genes for inherited cataract.3 α-Crystallin is made up of two polypeptides αA and αB encoded by the CRYAA gene on chromosome 21q22.3 and CRYAB gene on 11q22–q22.3, respectively. In addition to its structural role α-crystallin also functions as a molecular chaperone within the lens and other tissues.4 Mutations in both CRYAA and CRYAB have been identified in families with ADCC2,5 and in one family with a missense mutation in CRYAB affected individuals had both cataract and an associated desmin related myopathy presumably caused by impaired chaperone function of the mutant protein.6 A nonsense mutation in CRYAA has also recently been reported in a consanguineous family with autosomal recessive cataract.7

The γ-crystallin gene cluster on chromosome 2q33–35 encompasses genes γA to D but only γC (CRYGC) and γD(CRYGD) are highly expressed in the human lens. Missense mutations in both genes have been identified in families with ADCC exhibiting a range of different phenotypes. Two different missense mutations within CRYGD (R36S and R58H) are associated with a crystalline-like cataract8,9 and functional studies suggest that this may be due to reduced solubility and increased likelihood of crystallisation of the mutant protein.10 The β-crystallin family encompasses four acidic (A) and three basic (B) forms encoded by genes on chromosomes 2, 17, and 22. Four mutations have been reported in the β-crystallin genes. Two different splice site mutations have been reported in the CRYBA1 gene on chromosome 17q11.2 associated with nuclear and pulverulent phenotypes11,12 and a CRYBB1 nonsense mutation has been reported in a family with pulverulent cataract.13

A missense mutation in CRYBB2 (Q155X) has been identified in three unrelated families with ADCC14–16; interestingly, the phenotype in each family is very different despite the identical mutation indicating that other modifier genes are likely to influence the cataract phenotype. Such modifier gene influences have recently been identified in a recessive murine cataract and it is likely that similar gene-gene interactions will be identified in human cataract.17

At least 15 different mutations in the crystallin genes have now been implicated in human cataract associated with a diverse range of phenotypes. It is still unclear what proportion of inherited cataract is associated with crystallin gene mutations as few studies have involved systematic screening of all crystallin genes in a large patient population. Burdon et al in this issue of BJO (p 79), however, report the results of one such study. They have used both linkage analysis and candidate gene screening to investigate the molecular pathology of inherited cataract in 38 families with AD and AR inherited cataract ascertained in southern Australia. They confined their investigation to five crystallin genes previously implicated in inherited cataract. Surprisingly perhaps, only two mutations (both of which have been described previously), a missense mutation (P23T) in CRYGD and a splice site mutation in CRYBA1/A3, were identified in the 38 pedigrees. Crystallin gene mutations at least in this specific population are an uncommon cause of inherited cataract.

There are a large number of potential candidate genes for inherited cataract and to date mutations have been identified in genes encoding various members of the crystallin family, membrane proteins including lens connexins,18–22 aquaporin 0 (MIP)23 and LIM2,24 the cytoskeletal protein, beaded filament structural protein 2 (BFSP2)25,26 and the transcription factors PITX3,27 HSF4,28 and MAF.29 Very few mutations have been reported in each gene which suggests that that none of the genes so far identified accounts for a significant proportion of inherited cataract. It appears that inherited cataract is genetically very heterogeneous but given the paucity of studies that have screened all known cataract genes in a panel of carefully phenotyped patients it is still uncertain whether one or more genes may account for a significant proportion of cases.

Is it really worth investing in this expensive genetic research when we have a very effective treatment for age related cataract? The answer must be yes

The identification of the genetic mutations underlying congenital cataract and subsequent functional studies will improve our understanding of normal lens development and the mechanisms of cataractogenesis. This information, although important, is unlikely to lead to any major clinical advance in the prevention of or management of congenital cataract as the cataracts in this young age group are usually present from birth. The importance of this type of research is in its implications for the more common age related cataract. Sibling and twin studies suggest that genetic factors play an important part in the aetiology of age related cataract.30,31 The genes implicated in monogenic forms of cataract are good candidate genes for age related cataract. The pathogenesis of such cataracts is, however, likely to be complex with age, genetic background, environmental exposures, and other disease associated risk factors such as diabetes all involved. It remains a major challenge, given these complex interactions, to identify the genes involved.32

Is it really worth investing in this expensive genetic research when we have a very effective treatment for age related cataract? The answer must be yes. Cataract remains the commonest cause of blindness worldwide and although surgical treatment is associated with excellent visual outcomes the demand for surgery exceeds the ability of most healthcare systems to deliver timely treatment. This problem is likely to worsen as the incidence of cataract increases as a result of demographic changes with the elderly making up a greater proportion of the population. Treatment to slow down the progression of cataract would have a significant effect on the demand for cataract surgery but prevention strategies depend upon an understanding of disease aetiology and need to be targeted at those individuals at greatest risk. An understanding of the genetic sequence variants that confer an increased risk of developing cataract holds the key to developing a medical treatment.

Note in Proof

Treatment to slow down the progression of cataract would have a significant effect on the demand for cataract surgery


Linked Articles