Responses

PDF

The relation of volume with outcome in phacoemulsification surgery
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    The monitoring of outcomes after cataract surgery
    • Jonathon Q Ng, Research registrar
    • Other Contributors:
      • Nigel Morlet, James B. Semmens

    Dear Editor

    The work by Habib et al [1] is a timely one with the increasingly important role of assessment and monitoring of the quality of health service delivery and outcomes. As they indicate, little work exists in ophthalmology on the associations between surgical volume and outcomes. This may partly be due to the low rate of serious complications with ophthalmic surgery such as cataract extraction. However...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.