Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The use of porous polyethylene (Medpor) lower eyelid spacers in lid heightening and stabilisation
  1. J Tan1,
  2. J Olver2,
  3. M Wright3,
  4. R Maini2,
  5. C Neoh1,
  6. A J Dickinson1
  1. 1Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  2. 2Western Eye Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
  1. Correspondence to: A Jane Dickinson Eye Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; Jane.Dickinsonncl.ac.uk

Abstract

Background/aims: The management of lower eyelid retraction can be challenging, and established techniques to correct it are not always successful. Previous reports have suggested a role for the ultrathin high density porous polyethylene lower eyelid spacer (Medpor LES) in such patients. The authors report the experience of three surgeons implanting Medpor LES over 1 year, and ascertain whether such implants are a safe and effective alternative to autogenous spacers.

Methods: A prospective, interventional, non-comparative case series of consecutive patients. Surgical indications for Medpor LES were noted. Preoperative and postoperative lower marginal reflex distance (L-MRD), vertical palpebral aperture (PA), lagophthalmos, and scleral show inferior to the limbus (LSS) were recorded, together with major and minor complications.

Results: 32 patients (35 eyelids) had a Medpor LES inserted, 22/32 under local anaesthetic, and nine with adjunctive procedures. Mean follow up was 22 months (range 15–28 months). The Medpor LES was effective in reducing the palpebral aperture (p<0.001) and lagophthalmos (p = 0.04) and raising the lower eyelid height by reducing both L-MRD (p  =  0.006) and LSS (p<0.001). However there were major complications in 7/32 patients and minor complications in 8/32, most requiring further surgery. Final outcome was good in 24/35 eyelids and satisfactory in 5/35.

Conclusions: Despite a good or satisfactory final outcome in the majority of patients, the value of this technique is limited by complications, and should be reserved for those unsuitable for safer techniques.

  • LES, lower eyelid spacer
  • L-MRD, lower marginal reflex distance
  • LSS, scleral show inferior to the limbus
  • PA, palpebral aperture
  • PESS, post-enucleation socket syndrome
  • Medpor
  • porous polyethylene
  • lower eyelid spacer
  • implant
  • LES, lower eyelid spacer
  • L-MRD, lower marginal reflex distance
  • LSS, scleral show inferior to the limbus
  • PA, palpebral aperture
  • PESS, post-enucleation socket syndrome
  • Medpor
  • porous polyethylene
  • lower eyelid spacer
  • implant

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Conflicting interests: none.

  • This paper was presented in part at the meetings of the British Oculoplastic Surgery Society, Manchester, May 2002, and the European Society Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Munster, September 2002.