Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 4 January 2005
- Published on: 28 September 2004
- Published on: 4 January 2005Response to Professor BajajShow More
Dear Editor
We read with interest the comments of Professor Bajaj and colleagues and wish to respond to the points raised as follows.
Firstly, we are in complete agreement that the horizontal laxity of the eyelid should be evaluated pre-operatively and indeed this was done. This led to the necessity for 9 of the patients (28%) to undergo primary adjunctive procedures as stated in the article. Indeed 1...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 28 September 2004A Perspective on Porous Polyethylene Lower Lid SpacersShow More
Dear Editor
We read with interest the article on the use of Medpor lower eyelid spacers by Tan et al. [1]. The article critically evaluates the utility of this type of a spacer for retraction of the lower lid. We would like to raise a few pertinent issues which may assist in a better understanding of this challenging entity.
In this article, the authors have not included the assessment of horizontal lid...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.