Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Miura and co-authors have contributed valuable experimental data on transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) for choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) in a rat model.1 In their scholarly discussion section, they speculate that the variability in power settings they encountered in heating experimental CNV may be due to a “variation of heat conduction in experimental CNV.”1 There are more probable explanations for that variability. As reported previously in the authors’ reference 7: “light absorption in pigment clumps from prior focal photocoagulation can cause local hot spots in large TTT treatment fields.”2 Additionally, local choroidal blood flow2 may have been altered by vascular remodelling that occurred in the 14 days between the intense focal laser photocoagulation that the authors used to produce CNV and their subsequent liposomal monitored TTT at the site.
Chorioretinal temperature rise from a lengthy 60 seconds TTT exposure is affected: (1) by pigmentation at the treatment site, which determines how effectively laser radiant energy is converted locally into thermal energy, and (2) to a lesser extent by choroidal blood flow,3 which transfers thermal energy by heat convection away from the exposure site. It is unlikely that local heat conduction is altered significantly by the initial photocoagulation or subsequent tissue remodelling because heat conduction in most normal biological tissues is essentially the same as that of water.4–6