Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The visual field in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis
  1. M R Stanford1,
  2. E A Tomlin1,
  3. O Comyn1,
  4. K Holland1,
  5. C Pavesio2
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK
  2. 2Uveitis Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Mr M R Stanford MD, FRCOphth, Medical Eye Unit, St Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK;


Aims: To document loss of central field in patients with scars from toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis close to the disc after resolution of disease.

Methods: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were enrolled from four centres. Automated central visual field testing was performed when their disease had settled and retinal photographs of the lesions were taken. The type of central field defect (whether absolute or relative) and whether it broke out to the periphery were correlated with the size of the retinochoroidal scar and its proximity to the optic nerve head.

Results: 69 eyes were enrolled; 16 (26%) were discarded because of poor field performance. Of the 53 remaining eyes, 31 showed absolute defects and 20 relative defects. Scars within one disc diameter of the disc were more likely to be associated with absolute defects breaking out to the periphery.

Conclusion: The scarring induced by toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis is associated with considerable field loss when it occurs close to the optic nerve head. Current treatment is unlikely to ameliorate this situation. The degree of visual field loss should be an outcome measure for future trials of the efficacy of treatment trials for the disease.

  • visual fields
  • toxoplasma
  • retinochoroiditis

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests: none declared