Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 27 March 2006
- Published on: 14 February 2006
- Published on: 27 March 2006Re: The role of Mohs excision in periocular basal cell carcinomaShow More
Dear Editor,
We thank Barnes et al for their interest in our study and for affording us the opportunity to correct some misinterpretations that others may also have made regarding our paper.
We agree entirely that histological examination of the complete excision surface as suggested by Mohs would be the ideal one should aim at and that it would be superior to conventional bread loaf histological sect...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 14 February 2006The role of Mohs excision in periocular basal cell carcinomaShow More
Dear Editor,
We read with interest the paper by Hamada et al 1, which draws a number of conclusions from a five year follow up study of 69 periocular BCCs treated by conventional surgery, and in particular suggests that there is no place for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in patients with periocular BCCs. MMS is the serial saucerisation excision with mapped horizontal tissue sections examining 100% of the surg...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.