Unregistered visual impairment: is registration a failing system? | British Journal of Ophthalmology

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via AAO

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Responses

Clinical science

Scientific reports

Unregistered visual impairment: is registration a failing system?

Compose a Response to This Article

Compose Response

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

No

Please describe the competing interests

PLEASE NOTE:

A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.

I agree to and have read the terms and conditions for rapid responses and BMJ Privacy Notice *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Certificate of Visual Impairment
Catey Bunce
Published on: 22 March 2016

Published on: 22 March 2016
Certificate of Visual Impairment
- Catey Bunce, Medical Statistician
- Other Contributors:
  Roger A. Hitchings
Dear Editor,
We read with interest the recent report by Barry and Murray on unregistered visual impairment. It is important to note, however, that this paper relates to registration instigated by completion of BD8 certificates. In September 2003, Stephen Ladyman, the then Health Minister, Department of Health, announced changes to the process of registration, referral and identification for visual impairment...
Show More

Dear Editor,
We read with interest the recent report by Barry and Murray on unregistered visual impairment. It is important to note, however, that this paper relates to registration instigated by completion of BD8 certificates. In September 2003, Stephen Ladyman, the then Health Minister, Department of Health, announced changes to the process of registration, referral and identification for visual impairment in England stating that the BD8 was trying to do too much. The BD8 certificate was replaced by the Certificate of Visual Impairment 2003 in November 2003 and two referral letters were introduced for use by eye clinics and high street optometrists to alert social services to the needs of people with vision impairments in advance of certification. The Welsh Assembly Government is reported to be awaiting final revisions of the forms before deciding whether this approach will be adopted also in Wales.
A further issue worth consideration is that any study that attempts to assess coverage of certification by application of certification criteria to visual status at one point in time will detect under-registration and "inappropriate" registration. Measures of visual function show variability – visual acuity can fluctuate greatly in an individual with diabetic eye disease and the point at which someone becomes certifiable due to visual field loss in glaucoma is not easy to determine. Patients need time to come to terms with their loss of vision and consultants need time to determine whether an individual is certifiable. One should not underestimate the distress faced by an individual when told that their condition is certifiable for registration as blind or partially sighted.
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top