Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Is intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) safe?
  1. S Michels
  1. Correspondence to: University Eye Hospital Vienna Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; stephan.michels{at}meduniwien.ac.at

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Can a drug be safe if an FDA warning has been issued for it?

Can a drug for which a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning has been issued be safe? The question of safety using off-label intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA; Roche AG, Basle, Switzerland) is a concern among ophthalmologists around the globe. This is one of the key aspects of The international intravitreal bevacizumab safety survey: using the internet to assess drug safety worldwide published by A Fung et al1 (see page xxx). Why else would 70 centres from 12 countries voluntarily report on >7000 injections in >5000 patients using an internet-based questionnaire within just 6 months?

The safety survey reported no drug-related adverse events for intravitreal bevacizumab injections beyond the level of incidence rates seen in control groups of current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) trials in ophthalmology. No single adverse event reported was above 0.21% over a mean follow-up of 3.5 months. On the one hand, a self-reported safety survey may have the risk of underestimating adverse events, which was discussed by the authors; on the other hand, hardly any prospective clinical trial would be able to obtain safety data from such a diversity of centres, using different techniques for preparing and injecting bevacizumab and for …

View Full Text