Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Conjunctival markers as predictable markers for preoperative glaucoma assessment
  1. P-J Pisella
  1. Correspondence to: P-J Pisella Department of Ophthalmology, Hopital Bretonneau, University François Rabelais, Tours France – 2 bd, Tonnellé 37000 Tours, France; pj.pisella{at}chu-tours.fr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Glaucoma and the conjunctiva

Filtering surgery throughout its development has mainly focused on the ocular surface, most particularly the conjunctiva. Similarly, all doctors treating patients with glaucoma should also concentrate on the status of the patient’s ocular surface, not only at the time of surgery but especially before. The glaucomatous patient is the primary category of patients who may have side effects from long term topical treatment.

Currently, it is well known that the chronic use of eye drops has a cumulative toxic effect on the conjunctival epithelium. Broadway et al1,2 have shown the role of medical treatment as a risk factor for filtering surgery failure. They clearly showed that the success rate was considerably lower (55%) in patients treated with one or more drugs for glaucoma for at least 3 years than in other patients (94%, p<0.001). Later, Baudouin et al3 showed the major component of conjunctival toxicity inside a bottle of eyedrops for glaucoma—preservatives, with few differences between the various types, but particularly well studied in benzalkonium chloride (BAK), still the most frequently found preservative in eye drops. …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.