Responses

Download PDFPDF
Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency doubling technology perimetry
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Author's reply

    Dear Editor,

    We appreciate a response to our study from Dr Landers et al. They reported that five out of ten eyes with abnormal result of Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDP) and normal result of Achromatic Automated Perimetry (AAP) showed abnormal result on AAP four years later.[1] It was our mistake that we referred their study as a cross-sectional study in our paper. We apologize to them that we should have referr...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Detecting early visual field loss with Frequency Doubling Perimetry

    Dear Editor,

    We congratulate Kogure et al,[1] on a well designed longitudinal study, which confirms the suspicions of many earlier investigators, who conjectured that Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDP) may be able to detect visual field loss earlier than Achromatic Automated Perimetry (AAP) based on cross-sectional data. In their text they refer to our longitudinal study[2] as a cross-sectional one and go on to s...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.