You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Clinical science
Scientific reports
Improved automated perimetry performance following exposure to Mozart
  1. V Macedo Batista Fiorelli*,
  2. N Kasahara*,
  3. R Cohen,
  4. A Santucci França,
  5. M Della Paolera,
  6. C Mandia, Jr,
  7. G Vicente de Almeida
  1. Santa Casa of Sao Paulo, Department of Ophthalmology and School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
  1. Correspondence to: Vanessa Macedo Batista Fiorelli MD, Alameda Alemanha, 106, Bragança Paulista, SP, 12910-035, Brazil; fiorelliliv{at}uol.com.br

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the performance on automated perimetry (AP) after listening to a Mozart sonata in normal subjects naive to AP.

Methods: 60 naive normal subjects underwent AP (SITA 24-2). The study group (30 subjects) underwent AP after listening to Mozart’s Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major and the control group (30 subjects) underwent AP without previous exposure to the music.

Results: The study group had significantly less fixation loss, false positive, and false negative rates compared to controls (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Listening to Mozart seems to improve AP performance in normal naive subjects.

  • AP, automated perimetry
  • FL, fixation loss
  • FP, false positive errors
  • MD, mean deviation
  • PD, pattern deviation
  • PSD, pattern standard deviation
  • TD, total deviation
  • VA, visual acuity
  • automated perimetry
  • visual field
  • music
  • Mozart
  • glaucoma
  • AP, automated perimetry
  • FL, fixation loss
  • FP, false positive errors
  • MD, mean deviation
  • PD, pattern deviation
  • PSD, pattern standard deviation
  • TD, total deviation
  • VA, visual acuity
  • automated perimetry
  • visual field
  • music
  • Mozart
  • glaucoma

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.085902

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • ↵* These authors share equal responsibility in the preparation of the manuscript.

    • The authors have no financial interest in any of the products mentioned in the article.

    Linked Articles

    • BJO at a glance
      BJO at a glance
      Creig Hoyt
      British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006; 90 521-521 Published Online First: 21 Apr 2006. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.bjmay06atag
    • Editorial
      Mozart in AVF testing
      R Stamper
      British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006; 90 523-523 Published Online First: 18 Apr 2006. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.090670