Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Intravitreal triamcinolone versus laser photocoagulation for persistent diabetic macular oedema
  1. Z K Ockrim1,
  2. S Sivaprasad2,
  3. S Falk2,
  4. S Roghani2,
  5. C Bunce2,
  6. Z Gregor2,
  7. P Hykin2
  1. 1
    Giffnock, Glasgow, UK
  2. 2
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  1. Ms Z K Ockrim, Royal Alexander Hospital, Corsebar Road, Paisley PA2 9PN, UK; zoe_ockrim{at}


Aim: To determine if repeated intravitreal triamcinolone improves best corrected visual acuity at 1 year compared with conventional laser therapy for persistent diabetic macular oedema.

Methods: 88 eyes with persistent clinically significant macular oedema, after at least one prior laser photocoagulation, were included in this prospective randomised controlled trial. 43 patients were randomised to 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone (TA) and 45 to laser photocoagulation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who improved by 15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at 12 months in TA versus laser groups. Secondary endpoints were the change in mean best corrected visual acuity, difference in macular thickness and macular volume and adverse event reporting in particular elevated intraocular pressure at 12 months.

Results: Improvement in ⩾15 ETDRS letters occurred in two of 42 patients in the TA group (4.8%) and in five of 41 (12.2%) patients in the laser group (p = 0.265). At baseline, the mean ETDRS scores at baseline were 54.4 letters in the TA group and 53.0 letters in the laser group. At 12 months, these were 54.5 and 54.6, respectively. Optical coherence tomography showed a reduction in central macular thickness of 82.0 μm with TA and 62.3 μm with laser at 12 months. There was one case of sterile endophthalmitis. 22 out of 43 patients in the triamcinolone group required ocular antihypertensives.

Conclusion: This study did not show a benefit from intravitreal triamcinolone over conventional laser therapy for patients with chronic diabetic macular oedema

Statistics from


  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: This prospective randomised trial was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Research and Ethics Committees at Moorfields Eye Hospital.

  • Patient consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before details of medical and ophthalmic examinations were recorded.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • At a glance
    Harminder S Dua Arun D Singh