Optical coherence tomography: limits of the retinal-mapping program in age-related macular degeneration
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    O C T : limits of the retinal-mapping program in age-related macular degeneration
    • Srinivas R Sadda
    • Other Contributors:
      • Pearse A. Keane, Sandra Liakopoulos, Alexander C. Walsh
    Dear Editors

    We read with interest the recent study by Krebs et al. demonstrating the limitations of StratusOCT mapping software in the context of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).[1] We wish to applaud the authors for their study - while the limitations of StratusOCT automated analysis have previously been reported,[2] the fact remains that many ophthalmologists may not be well acquainted with these errors. We agree wi...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.