Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Subretinal Brilliant Blue G migration during internal limiting membrane peeling
  1. M Maia,
  2. M E Farah,
  3. E B Rodrigues,
  4. F K Malerbi
  1. Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  1. Correspondence to Dr F K Malerbi, Rua Jacques Felix, 314/51, 04509-001, São Paulo-SP, Brazil; femalerbi{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with interest the article by Schumann et al,1 who have reported the ultrastructural analyses of internal limiting membrane (ILM) specimens after staining with new dye Brilliant Blue G (BBG). In their study, morphological analyses failed to reveal any adverse effects possibly related to BBG. However, they stated that ultrastructural analyses alone may not be sufficient to allow definite conclusions on the safety of a vital dye used for macular surgery. Here we report the effects of accidental subretinal migration of BBG for ILM identification during vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM).

A 56-year-old man had decreased visual acuity and metamorphopsia. He had an idiopathic ERM, and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart was 1.0 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 6/60). Pars plana vitrectomy and ERM peeling …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR