Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Authors’ response
  1. S Binder,
  2. B Wimpissinger,
  3. L Kellner,
  4. W Brannath,
  5. K Krepler,
  6. U Stolba,
  7. C Mihalics
  1. Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, LBI for Retinology and Biomicroscopic Laser Surgery, Vienna 1030, Austria
  1. Correspondence to Professor S Binder, Department of Ophthalmology Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, LBI for Retinology and Biomicroscopic Laser Surgery, Juchgasse 25, Vienna 1010, Austria; susanne.binder{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In response to the letter of Sinha et al1 concerning our article “23 Gauge versus 20 Gauge System for Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial” we would like to publish the following answer:

For analysis of postoperative pain, we used a simplified verbal rating scale (ranging from 0, meaning no pain, to 3, meaning severe pain). The standardised verbal rating scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (“the worst pain possible”), which we think is too extensive for our patients and purpose.

In the literature, verbal rating scales are described to be a valid, reliable and appropriate tool for determination of postoperative pain in clinical practice1 2 Furthermore, we believe that the assessment of postoperative pain is not likely to be biased, if the assessor is not masked, because the perception of pain is a completely subjective parameter and is not likely to be influenced, if the …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles