Aims To assess the outcome of external dacryocystorhinostomies (DCRs) in patients with patent but non-functional lacrimal drainage systems and to identify any preoperative clinical or dacryocystography (DCG) and lacrimal scintigraphy (LS) factors associated with successful surgery.
Methods A retrospective study of 46 DCRs with silicone intubation performed for patients with epiphora associated with a clinically patent lacrimal drainage system. All patients underwent preoperative DCG and LS which were evaluated for presence, site and severity of delayed clearance. DCGs were also evaluated for reflux and anatomical abnormalities. Postoperative success was determined by subjective resolution of epiphora. Patients with persistent symptoms were offered Lester Jones Tube (LJT) insertion after establishment of a patent anastomosis to syringing and normal ostium on nasal endoscopy. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 and Fisher exact tests to determine whether there was any association between surgical outcome and preoperative resistance to lacrimal syringing, DCG and LS findings.
Results 29 cases (63%) reported subjective surgical success after 11 months' average follow-up. There was a statistically significant association between increased resistance to syringing preoperatively and successful DCR (p=0.012). Of the 17 eyes that failed, all had patent anastomoses, and seven went on to have LJT insertion with complete resolution of symptoms.
Conclusion The majority of patients with patent but non-functional lacrimal drainage systems will be helped by DCR surgery, with greater success rates in those with significant reflux on preoperative syringing. For patients with residual epiphora, functional success can reach 100% with subsequent LJT insertion.
- functional obstruction
- lacrimal drainage
- treatment surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.