Aim To determine the sub-macular Bruch's membrane (BrM) macrophage count and the choroidal and BrM macrophage immunophenotype in normal eyes and in eyes with early and advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Methods BrM macrophages were counted in 125 human eyes (normal, normal aged, early AMD and geographical atrophy), and CD68 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) immunohistochemistry was performed on 16 human eyes (normal, normal aged, early AMD, geographical atrophy and disciform scarring). All eyes were examined clinically ante mortem. Results were correlated with histopathological features, including basal laminar deposit and membranous debris, and with clinical fundus appearance.
Results CD68+ macrophages were found in the choroid of normal human eyes, and did not express iNOS. Expression of iNOS by choroidal macrophages (as well as endothelial cells and pericytes) was associated with: (1) recruitment of macrophages to BrM in early AMD eyes with soft drusen or thick continuous basal laminar deposit, corresponding to clinically detectable soft drusen or pigment changes; and (2) active disciform scarring. iNOS expression was absent in BrM macrophages, suggesting immunomodulatory differences between the choroid and BrM. The highest BrM macrophage counts were found in eyes with subclinical choroidal neovascularisation.
Conclusion The presence of extracellular deposits (soft drusen and thick continuous basal laminar deposit) is associated with macrophage recruitment to BrM and alteration in the immunophenotype of resident choroidal macrophages.
- membranous debris
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding National Health & Medical Research Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia (SC).
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the University of NSW Human Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.