You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

At a glance
At a glance
Free
  1. Harminder S Dua,
  2. Arun D Singh, Editors-in-Chief

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.190975

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    24-h versus daytime IOP phasing

    Moodie et al determined the value of daytime and 24 h phasing in patients treated for progressive POAG despite apparently adequate IOP control. They performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients (76) that had undergone IOP measurement in the clinic and daytime (08:00–18:00) or 24-h phasing. There was no significant difference between mean IOP values measured in clinic and daytime phasing or between clinic values and nighttime phasing. Although the mean daytime phasing IOP was significantly higher than the mean nighttime phasing IOP, there was no significant difference in the impact on management that occurred as a result of phasing between the daytime and 24-h groups. The authors conclude that 24-h phasing offers little advantage over daytime phasing in the identification of IOP fluctuations. See page 999

    Myopia in Singapore Chinese preschool children

    Wilson et al investigated the risk factors for myopia, including near work and outdoor activity, in a cross-sectional study …

    View Full Text

    Linked Articles