Aim To determine the prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among indigenous Australians living in central Australia.
Methods 1884 individuals aged 20 years or older, living in one of 30 remote communities within the statistical local area of “Central Australia”, were recruited for this study, from which 1883 were assessable. This equated to 36% of those ≥20 years old and 67% of those ≥40 years old within this district. Participants were recruited as they presented to the eye clinic at each remote community. Patients underwent Snellen visual acuity testing and subjective refraction. After this, an assessment of their anterior and posterior segments was made. Rates and causes of bilateral visual impairment (vision worse than Snellen visual acuity 6/12 in the better eye) and bilateral blindness (Snellen visual acuity worse than 6/60 in the better eye) were presented.
Results 19.4% (365/1883) had bilateral visual impairment (25.1% of those ≥40 years old) and 2.8% (53/1883) had bilateral blindness (3.6% of those ≥40 years old). Refractive error followed by cataract were the main causes for bilateral visual impairment and blindness. Following these, diabetic eye disease and trachomatous corneal opacification were the main causes of bilateral visual impairment and bilateral blindness, respectively.
Conclusion This study indicates that bilateral visual impairment and blindness are, respectively, 25.1% and 3.6% among indigenous Australians, four to seven times higher than among the non-indigenous Australian population. Trachoma is the leading cause of bilateral blindness after refractive error and cataract.
- Indigenous Australians
- Central Australia
- visual impairment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding Partial equipment grants for the study were received from the Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia: B & L Lowe Grant and the NH&MRC: Centre for Clinic Research Excellence.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Central Australian Human Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.