Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Prospective randomised comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: considerations of power
  1. S Dulku,
  2. A Murray,
  3. O M Durrani
  1. Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Simon Dulku, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK; simon.dulku{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with interest the article by Saiju et al1 on a randomised trial comparing the success of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with and without silicone intubation. The authors concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups and that their study did not support the routine use of silicone tubes. However, we are concerned that the study did not recruit sufficient patients to reach statistical significance.

When a study fails to demonstrate a statistically significant difference, this can be for one of two reasons: (1) that there really is no difference in the wider population between the two arms of the study or (2) that there may be a difference, but insufficient patients were recruited to demonstrate this. …

View Full Text


  • Linked articles 176743

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles