Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
I read with interest the recent work by Chandra et al and commend them for collecting such a group of patients, but I wish for clarification on a few points.1 They described the present work as a retrospective case–control study; I feel that this is incorrect. The patients studied were selected on the basis of an exposure of interest, in this case to warfarin pharmacotherapy and matched with respect to age, sex and presenting complaint. The participants were followed (retrospectively) to record outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy as well as presenting …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.