Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Never too old to harbour a young man's disease?
  1. Sylvia Giraudet1,
  2. Cédric Lamirel1,
  3. Patrizia Amati-Bonneau2,
  4. Pascal Reynier2,
  5. Dominique Bonneau2,
  6. Dan Miléa1,
  7. Isabelle Cochereau1
  1. 1Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital, Angers, France
  2. 2INSERM, U694, and Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, University Hospital, Angers, France
  1. Correspondence to Cédric Lamirel, Service d'ophtalmologie, CHU d'Angers, 2 rue Larrey, 49933 Angers cedex 9, France; ophtalmologie{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


An 87-year-old male patient was referred for evaluation of rapidly progressive sequential painless visual loss, occurring 2 months earlier. The right eye was first affected, and at that time the examination performed by the treating ophthalmologist was within normal limits. One month later, rapid progressive visual loss occurred in the remaining eye. In each eye, visual loss occurred over a few days, with no subsequent changes. The patient had a previous history of prostate adenocarcinoma in remission and mild, treated arterial hypertension. He had an otherwise unremarkable personal medical history, and an ophthalmological examination performed 6 months earlier was normal in both eyes. The patient disclosed several members of the family with blindness: his brother with onset at the age of 30, his sister's son (age of onset was unknown) and his sister's daughter with onset at the age of 3.

On examination, visual acuity was hand movements in the right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. There was no relative afferent pupillary defect and no proptosis and ocular motility was normal. Slit-lamp examination was within normal limits and intraocular pressure was 16 mm Hg in both eyes. Funduscopy disclosed mild optic disc palor, with no pathological excavation in both eyes, but the remainder of the examination was normal. Goldmann visual fields disclosed severe impairment in both eyes, with remaining peripheral islands of vision inferiorly and temporally (figure 1). In the left eye, the visual field loss spared the inferior central area, explaining the residual visual acuity. The remainder of the neurological and general examination was normal.

Figure 1

Goldman visual fields …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.