You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Authors' response
  1. Theocharis Papanikolaou1,
  2. Siddharth Goel2,
  3. D Gerard R Jayamanne3,
  4. Hardeep Mudhar4,
  5. Shrivatsa P Desai3
  1. 1Addenbrooke's Teaching Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2Diana Princess of Wales Hospital, Grimsby, UK
  3. 3Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals, Doncaster, UK
  4. 4Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Theocharis Papanikolaou, Addenbrooke's Teaching Hospital, 187B Newmarket Road, Cambridge CB5 8HA, UK; papanikolaou{at}doctors.net.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.199752

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We would like to thank Khan et al for their interest in our article and the useful comments.1

    In our cases,2 apart from the phenotypic appearances the diagnosis was also based on histological findings from case no. 2.

    On histopathological examination, neither the lamellar corneal button …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Linked articles 198655.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • PostScript
      Reply to Papanikolaou et al
      Kamron Khan Manir Ali Chris Inglehearn
      British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 95 890-890 Published Online First: 16 Dec 2010. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.198655