Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Incorrect study design and analysis: visual acuity outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a case-control study
  1. Gerald McGwin Jr1,2
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  1. Correspondence to Gerald McGwin, Departments of Epidemiology and Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 609 Eye Foundation Hospital, 1720 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; mcgwin{at}uab.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The recently published study by Tan et al1 is described as a retrospective case-control study; however, this is incorrect. The study participants were selected on the basis of an exposure of interest, that is, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty and matched with respect to age, race and diagnosis. The study participants were followed (retrospectively) for …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Linked article 205161.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    Donald Tan Hla Myint Htoon Arundhati Anshu Anand Parthasarathy